ArticlePharmacoEconomics2018
Estimating Drug Costs: How do Manufacturer Net Prices Compare with Other Common US Price References?
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cost per cumulative clinical benefit of biologic therapies for patients with plaque psoriasis: a systematic review.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2021Pooled it
- A Critical Appraisal and Recommendations for Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Pooled it
- Real World Cost-of-Illness Evidence in Hepatitis C Virus: A systematic review.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Pooled it
- The impact of the United States most favored nation policies on prices of branded medicines and research and development.Health policy OPEN · 2026Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Methods Used in Evaluations of Treatment for Cystic Fibrosis: A Scoping Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Comparison of Price Index Methods and Drug Price Inflation Estimates for Hepatitis C Virus Medications.JAMA health forum · 2023Article
- Comparison of US and EU Prices for Orphan Drugs in the Perspective of the Considered US Orphan Drugs Act Modifications and Discussed Price-Regulation Mechanisms Adjustments in US and European Union.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Drug costs in context: assessing drug costs in cost-of-illness analyses.Drugs in context · 2022Article
- Pricing and Reimbursement Pathways of New Orphan Drugs in South Korea: A Longitudinal Comparison.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Adjunctive Use of Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Dipropionate Foam in a Real-World Setting Curtails the Cost of Biologics Without Reducing Efficacy in Psoriasis.Dermatology and therapy · 2020Article
- Sequencing Systemic Therapy Pathways for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost Effectiveness Analysis.Liver cancer · 2020Article
- Changes in Cost-Effectiveness for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Pharmacotherapy: The Case for Continuous Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Article
- Evolution of Average European Medicine Prices: Implications for the Methodology of External Price Referencing.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug costs are frequently estimated in economic analyses using wholesale acquisition cost (WAC), but what is the best approach to develop these estimates? Pharmaceutical manufacturers recently released transparency reports disclosing net price increases after accounting for rebates and other discounts.
objectiveOur objective was to determine whether manufacturer net prices (MNPs) could approximate the discounted prices observed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
methodsWe compared the annual, average price discounts voluntarily reported by three pharmaceutical manufacturers with the VA price for specific products from each company. The top 10 drugs by total sales reported from company tax filings for 2016 were included. The discount observed by the VA was determined from each drug's list price, reported as WAC, in 2016. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the VA discount observed and a weighted price index was calculated using the lowest price to the VA (Weighted VA Index), which was compared with the manufacturer index.
resultsThe discounted price as a percentage of the WAC ranged from 9 to 74%. All three indexes estimated by the average discount to the VA were at or below the manufacturer indexes (42 vs. 50% for Eli Lilly, 56 vs. 65% for Johnson & Johnson, and 59 vs. 59% for Merck).
conclusionsManufacturer-reported average net prices may provide a close approximation of the average discounted price granted to the VA, suggesting they may be a useful proxy for the true pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) or payer cost. However, individual discounts for products have wide variation, making a standard discount adjustment across multiple products less acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.