ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2018
Influence of incomplete neoadjuvant chemotherapy on esophageal carcinoma.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) involving two cycles of cisplatin plus fluorouracil is recommended in Japan as a standard treatment for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We have encountered patients who were administered incomplete chemotherapy because of adverse events or the patient's refusal of treatment. Here, we retrospectively investigated the influence on perioperative outcomes and long-term prognosis of patients with ESCC who underwent complete (two cycles) or incomplete (one cycle) NAC.
methodsWe retrospectively investigated 133 patients with locally advanced ESCC of the thoracic esophagus who underwent NAC. We compared the perioperative results and prognoses of patients who underwent complete or incomplete NAC because of adverse events or the patient's refusal of treatment.
resultsOf 133 patients, 37 patients did not receive the second cycle of NAC; the remaining 96 patients received the second cycle of NAC as scheduled. There were no significant differences in the clinical backgrounds, surgical results, or operative morbidity rates between the groups. Patients in both groups were similarly administered postoperative chemotherapy regimens. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival or overall survival.
conclusionsWe suggest that perioperative outcomes and long-term prognosis of patients with locally advanced ESCC were not significantly influenced, even if the patients did not receive a complete cycle of NAC. When certain adverse events occur after the first cycle of NAC, we believe that it is nevertheless possible to discontinue chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.