Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29752602›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2018

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Primary GISTs with Tumor Rupture in the Real World.

Toshirou Nishida, Haruhiko Cho, Seiichi Hirota, Toru Masuzawa, Gaku Chiguchi, Toshimasa Tsujinaka, Kinki GIST Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The impact of contour maps on estimating the risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence: indications for adjuvant therapy: an analysis of the Kinki GIST registry.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toshirou NishidaDepartment of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. tnishida@ncc.go.jp.
Haruhiko ChoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Seiichi HirotaDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Toru MasuzawaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Gaku ChiguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Toshimasa TsujinakaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kaizuka City Hospital, Kaizuka, Japan.
Kinki GIST Study Group

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 16H05419Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 16K15600National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 28-A-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are recommended for imatinib adjuvant therapy; however, their clinicopathological features and prognosis in the era of imatinib are unknown. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study cohort included 665 patients with histologically proven primary GISTs who underwent R0 or R1 surgery between 2003 and 2007; the validation cohort included 182 patients between 2000 and 2014. The definitions of tumor rupture in the study included perforation at tumor site, tumor fracture, piecemeal resection including open biopsy, and macroscopic injuries to the pseudocapsule.

resultsTumor rupture occurred in 21 (3.2%) of 665 and 5 (2.9%) of 182 patients in the study and validation cohort, respectively. Ruptured GISTs were more symptomatic, were larger in size, and had higher mitotic count than nonruptured GISTs but were not associated with tumor location or laparoscopic surgery. GISTs with intraoperative rupture had clinicopathological features and prognostic outcomes similar to those with preoperative rupture. Recurrence rates were higher and median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were shorter with ruptured than nonruptured GIST. Tumor rupture was one of the independent prognostic factors for RFS, but not OS, according to multivariate analysis.

conclusionsRuptured GISTs were symptomatic larger tumors with high mitotic activity, frequent relapse, and shorter RFS. Tumor rupture was an independent prognostic factor for RFS, but not for OS, in the era of imatinib.

Indexed as

Intraoperative ComplicationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29752602
PMCPMC5976711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.