ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2018
Anthracycline Use for Early Stage Breast Cancer in the Modern Era: a Review.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Beyond ejection fraction: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in anthracycline cardiotoxicity.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of high-intensity interval training on vascular endothelial function and vascular wall thickness in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy: a randomized pilot study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Trial
- Multifunctional chitosan-doxorubicin nanocarriers: advancing targeted breast cancer chemotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Design and characterization of phloretin-loaded PEG-lipid hybrid micelles for enhanced breast cancer therapy.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Patient factors and modifications to intended chemotherapy for women with Stages I-IIIA breast cancer.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- High-Sensitivity Troponin I: The Optimal Biomarker for Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity?JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Current Immunotherapy Approaches and Novel Anti-Cancer Vaccine Modalities for Clinical Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cancer-Related Alopecia Risk and Treatment.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Treatment, toxicity, and mortality after subsequent breast cancer in female survivors of childhood cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Accuracy of mitral annular plane systolic excursion in diagnosing anthracycline-induced subclinical cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer - a retrospective cohort study.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Exploring the effects of topoisomerase II inhibitor XK469 on anthracycline cardiotoxicity and DNA damage.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024Article
- Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative, T1b and T1c triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Influence of cyclin D1 splicing variants expression on breast cancer chemoresistance via CDK4/CyclinD1-pRB-E2F1 pathway.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Chemotherapeutic drugs for soft tissue sarcomas: a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Solid Tumors and Kinase Inhibition: Management and Therapy Efficacy Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: From pathobiology to identification of molecular targets for nuclear imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence ScoreClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2022Article
- Article
- lncRNA and breast cancer: Progress from identifying mechanisms to challenges and opportunities of clinical treatment.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
opinion statementAnthracycline-based regimens have been an important treatment component for patients with breast cancer. As demonstrated in the last Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) meta-analysis, anthracycline-based regimens decrease breast cancer mortality by 20-30%. Anthracycline toxicities include the rare-but potential morbid-cardiotoxicity or leukemogenic effect, and the almost universal-but very distressing-alopecia. Due to potential toxicities, and large number of patients being exposed, several worldwide trials have re-examined the role of anthracycline-based regimens in the management of breast cancer. Current literature supports that anthracyclines are not required for all patients with breast cancer and should be avoided in those with high cardiac risk. Recent results from the ABC trials suggest that anthracyclines should not be spared for patients with triple negative breast cancer (regardless of axillary node involvement) or HER2-/ER+ with significant node involvement. Based on current literature, for HER2-negative patients with low-risk breast cancer, anthracyclines could be spared with regimens such as cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) or docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC). Patients with intermediate or high-risk breast cancer should be considered for anthracycline-based regimens based on other factors such as age, comorbidities, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, and genomic profiling. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with low risk could be treated with paclitaxel and trastuzumab. For the remaining patients with HER2 overexpression, while docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH) has demonstrated to improve disease-free survival (DFS), anthracycline-containing regimens should be discussed, especially for those with very high-risk breast cancer. Although several biomarkers, such as topoisomerase II (TOP2A) and chromosome 17 centromeric duplication (Ch17CEP) have been proposed to predict benefit from anthracycline regimens, further research is required to delineate their proper utility in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29752560What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.