Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29752555›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2018

Minimally invasive surgery procedure in isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli, Maria Concetta Meluzio, Aaron Burrofato, Andrea Perna, Luca Proietti

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Tamburrelli FC et al., concerning "Prone single-position extreme lateral interbody fusion (Pro-XLIF): preliminary results" by Lamartina C and Berjano P (Eur Spine J; 2020: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06303-z).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  10. Letter to the editor concerning "Prone single-position extreme lateral interbody fusion (Pro-XLIF): preliminary results" by Lamartina C and Berjano P (Eur Spine J; 2020: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06303-z).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco Ciro TamburrelliSpinal Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. francescociro.tamburrelli@unicatt.it.
Maria Concetta MeluzioSpinal Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Aaron BurrofatoSpinal Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Andrea PernaSpinal Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Luca ProiettiSpinal Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the direct lateral approach to the lumbar spine in the treatment of painful isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.

methodsTwenty-one patients affected by isthmic spondylolisthesis and treated with extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation were enrolled. All included patients were clinically evaluated with Oswestry Disability Index, SF36 and Visual Scale Anatomy (VAS) for back pain at 1, 3 months and at 1 year.

resultsThe mean correction of vertebral slippage measured on lateral lumbar X-ray was 56.3% (p = 0.002). The average preoperative VAS score was 7.1, at 1 year decreasing to 2.2 (p = 0.001). The patients had an average preoperative "Oswestry Disability Index" of 36.8 and 24.1% after 1 year (p = 0.02). The preoperative Short-Form 36 Physical Health was equal to 33.8, 72.1% after 1 month, to 76.3% after 3 months and to 83.2% (p = 0.001) after 1 year of follow-up. There were no signs of implant loosening at 1-year CT scan examination in any of the patients.

conclusionThe study showed that the extreme lateral approach to the lumbar spine in case of isthmic spondylolisthesis is a reliable and safe option to the most common open procedures. In the authors' opinion, XLIF procedures allow a good correction of the listhesis associated with good clinical and radiographic results. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic supplementary material.

Indexed as

AdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRadiographySpinal FusionSpondylolisthesisTreatment OutcomeExtreme lateral interbody fusionIsthmic spondylolisthesisMISSpondylolysisXLIF

Identifiers

PMID29752555
OpenAlexW2799293283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.