Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29752486›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Effects of speed and direction of perturbation on electroencephalographic and balance responses.

Rahul Goel, Recep A Ozdemir, Sho Nakagome, Jose L Contreras-Vidal, William H Paloski, Pranav J Parikh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Delayed cortical engagement associated with balance dysfunction after stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Midfrontal theta dynamics index the monitoring of postural stability.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Assessment of Biomechanical Predictors of Occurrence of Low-Amplitude N1 Potentials Evoked by Naturally Occurring Postural Instabilities.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rahul GoelCenter for Neuromotor and Biomechanics Research, Department of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, 3875 Holman Street, Houston, TX, USA. rahul.goel20@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3516-6938
Recep A OzdemirBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sho NakagomeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Jose L Contreras-VidalDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
William H PaloskiHuman Research Program, Johnson Space Center, NASA, Houston, TX, USA.
Pranav J ParikhCenter for Neuromotor and Biomechanics Research, Department of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, 3875 Holman Street, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modulation of perturbation-evoked potential (PEP) N1 as a function of different biomechanical characteristics of perturbation has been investigated before. However, it remains unknown whether the PEP N1 modulation contributes to the shaping of the functional postural response. To improve this understanding, we examined the modulation of functional postural response in relation to the PEP N1 response in ten healthy young subjects during unpredictable perturbations to their upright stance-translations of the support surface in a forward or backward direction at two different amplitudes of constant speed. Using independent components from the fronto-central region, obtained from subject-specific head models created from the MRI, our results show that the latency of onset of the functional postural response after the PEP N1 response was faster for forward than backward perturbations at a constant speed but was not affected by the speed of perturbation. Further, our results reinforce some of the previous findings that suggested that the N1 peak amplitude and peak latency are both modulated by the speed of perturbation but not by the direction of the perturbation. Our results improve the understanding of the relation between characteristics of perturbation and the neurophysiology of reactive balance control and may have implications for the design of brain-machine interfaces for populations with a higher risk of falls.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePostural BalanceProprioceptionReaction TimeVisual PerceptionYoung AdultBalance responsePerturbation directionPerturbation-evoked potential (PEP) N1Perturbation speedPostural threat

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.