Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29751968›Full record

ArticleSurgery2018

Maintaining oncologic integrity with minimally invasive resection of pediatric embryonal tumors.

Hannah M Phelps, Gregory D Ayers, Josephine M Ndolo, Hannah L Dietrich, Katherine D Watson, Melissa A Hilmes, Harold N Lovvorn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Surgical Perspective.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah M PhelpsVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; Surgical Outcomes Center for Kids, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: hannah.m.phelps@vanderbilt.edu.
Gregory D AyersDivision of Cancer Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Josephine M NdoloDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hannah L DietrichVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN, USA.
Katherine D WatsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Melissa A HilmesDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Harold N LovvornSurgical Outcomes Center for Kids, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Persistent SIX2 expression as a first hit mechanism in Wilms tumorigenesisR03CA182063 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LOVVORN, HAROLD NEWTON · 2015 to 2016
$157k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA182063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmbryonal tumors arise typically in infants and young children and are often massive at presentation. Operative resection is a cornerstone in the multimodal treatment of embryonal tumors but potentially disrupts therapeutic timelines. When used appropriately, minimally invasive surgery can minimize treatment delays. The oncologic integrity and safety attainable with minimally invasive resection of embryonal tumors, however, remains controversial.

methodsQuery of the Vanderbilt Cancer Registry identified all children treated for intracavitary, embryonal tumors during a 15-year period. Tumors were assessed radiographically to measure volume (mL) and image-defined risk factors (neuroblastic tumors only) at time of diagnosis, and at preresection and postresection. Patient and tumor characteristics, perioperative details, and oncologic outcomes were compared between minimally invasive surgery and open resection of tumors of comparable size.

resultsA total of 202 patients were treated for 206 intracavitary embryonal tumors, of which 178 were resected either open (n = 152, 85%) or with minimally invasive surgery (n = 26, 15%). The 5-year, relapse-free, and overall survival were not significantly different after minimally invasive surgery or open resection of tumors having a volume less than 100 mL, corresponding to the largest resected with minimally invasive surgery (P = .249 and P = .124, respectively). No difference in margin status or lymph node sampling between the 2 operative approaches was detected (p = .333 and p = .070, respectively). Advantages associated with minimally invasive surgery were decreased blood loss (P < .001), decreased operating time (P = .002), and shorter hospital stay (P < .001). Characteristically, minimally invasive surgery was used for smaller volume and earlier stage neuroblastic tumors without image-defined risk factors.

conclusionWhen selected appropriately, minimally invasive resection of pediatric embryonal tumors, particularly neuroblastic tumors, provides acceptable oncologic integrity. Large tumor volume, small patient size, and image-defined risk factors may limit the broader applicability of minimally invasive surgery.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeuroblastomaRegistriesTennesseeTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID29751968
PMCPMC6658103
OpenAlexW2801619122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.