Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29751828›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2018

Augmentative and alternative communication in children with Down's syndrome: a systematic review.

Renata Thaís de Almeida Barbosa, Acary Souza Bulle de Oliveira, Jennifer Yohanna Ferreira de Lima Antão, Tânia Brusque Crocetta, Regiani Guarnieri, Thaiany Pedrozo Campos Antunes, Claudia Arab, Thaís Massetti, Italla Maria Pinheiro Bezerra, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reversing intellectual disabilities in Down syndrome: Hopes or hypes?The Indian journal of medical research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Renata Thaís de Almeida BarbosaLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Departamento de Saúde da Coletividade, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Rua Fagundes Varela, 121. Vila Príncipe de Gales, 09060510, Santo André, SP, Brasil. profrenatathais@gmail.com.
Acary Souza Bulle de OliveiraEscola Paulista de Medicina, Disciplina de Neurologia Clínica. Setor de Doenças Neuromusculares, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP-EPM), Rua Botucatu, 740, Vila Mariana, 04023900, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Jennifer Yohanna Ferreira de Lima AntãoLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Departamento de Saúde da Coletividade, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Rua Fagundes Varela, 121. Vila Príncipe de Gales, 09060510, Santo André, SP, Brasil.
Tânia Brusque CrocettaLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Departamento de Saúde da Coletividade, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Rua Fagundes Varela, 121. Vila Príncipe de Gales, 09060510, Santo André, SP, Brasil.
Regiani GuarnieriLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Departamento de Saúde da Coletividade, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Rua Fagundes Varela, 121. Vila Príncipe de Gales, 09060510, Santo André, SP, Brasil.
Thaiany Pedrozo Campos AntunesLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Departamento de Saúde da Coletividade, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Rua Fagundes Varela, 121. Vila Príncipe de Gales, 09060510, Santo André, SP, Brasil.
Claudia ArabEscola Paulista de Medicina. Disciplina de Cardiologia, Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Napoleão de Barros, 715, Vila Clementino, 04023062, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Thaís MassettiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Rua Cipotânea, 51, Cidade Universitária, 05360000, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Italla Maria Pinheiro BezerraEscola Superior de Ciências da Santa de Misericórdia de Vitória (EMESCAM), Av. N.S da Penha, 2190, Santa Luiza, 29045402, Vitória, ES, Brasil.
Carlos Bandeira de Mello MonteiroLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Departamento de Saúde da Coletividade, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Rua Fagundes Varela, 121. Vila Príncipe de Gales, 09060510, Santo André, SP, Brasil.
Luiz Carlos de AbreuLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Departamento de Saúde da Coletividade, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Rua Fagundes Varela, 121. Vila Príncipe de Gales, 09060510, Santo André, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of technology to assist in the communication, socialization, language, and motor skills of children with Down's syndrome (DS) is required. The aim of this study was to analyse research findings regarding the different instruments of 'augmentative and alternative communication' used in children with Down's syndrome.

methodsThis is a systematic review of published articles available on PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and BVS using the following descriptors: assistive technology AND syndrome, assistive technology AND down syndrome, down syndrome AND augmentative and alternative communication. Studies published in English were selected if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) study of children with a diagnosis of DS, and (2) assistive technology and/or augmentative and alternative communication analysis in this population.

resultsA total of 1087 articles were identified. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The instruments most used by the studies were speech-generating devices (SGDs) and the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS).

conclusionTwelve instruments that provided significant aid to the process of communication and socialization of children with DS were identified. These instruments increase the interaction between individuals among this population and their peers, contributing to their quality of life and self-esteem.

Indexed as

Communication Devices for People with DisabilitiesChildChild LanguageDown SyndromeHumansMotor SkillsSocial SkillsAssistive technologyAugmentative and alternative communicationChildrenDown’s syndrome

Identifiers

PMID29751828
PMCPMC5948828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.