Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29751798›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2018

Clinic flow for STI, HIV, and TB patients in an urban infectious disease clinic offering point-of-care testing services in Durban, South Africa.

Katrina J Stime, Nigel Garrett, Yukteshwar Sookrajh, Jienchi Dorward, Ntuthu Dlamini, Ayo Olowolagba, Monisha Sharma, Ruanne V Barnabas, Paul K Drain

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katrina J StimeCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Nigel GarrettCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Yukteshwar SookrajhPrince Cyril Zulu Communicable Disease Centre, eThekwini Municipality, Durban, South Africa.
Jienchi DorwardCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Ntuthu DlaminiPrince Cyril Zulu Communicable Disease Centre, eThekwini Municipality, Durban, South Africa.
Ayo OlowolagbaPrince Cyril Zulu Communicable Disease Centre, eThekwini Municipality, Durban, South Africa.
Monisha SharmaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Ruanne V BarnabasDepartment of Global Health, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Paul K DrainDepartment of Global Health, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. pkdrain@uw.edu.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Point-of-care viral load testing to enable task shifting for chronic HIV careR21AI124719 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DRAIN, PAUL K, GARRETT, NIGEL JOEL · 2016 to 2017
$336k
Enhanced STI management to reduce genital inflammation and HIV riskR21AI116759 · NIAID · CENTRE/AIDS PROGRAMME/RES/SOUTH AFRICA · PI GARRETT, NIGEL JOEL, ROMPALO, ANNE M · 2015 to 2016
$297k
National Institutes of Health and South African Medical Research Council AI116759NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI116759NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI124719NIH HHS AI124719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany clinics in Southern Africa have long waiting times. The implementation of point-of-care (POC) tests to accelerate diagnosis and improve clinical management in resource-limited settings may improve or worsen clinic flow and waiting times. The objective of this study was to describe clinic flow with special emphasis on the impact of POC testing at a large urban public healthcare clinic in Durban, South Africa.

methodsWe used time and motion methods to directly observe patients and practitioners. We created patient flow maps and recorded individual patient waiting and consultation times for patients seeking STI, TB, or HIV care. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 clinic staff to ascertain staff opinions on clinic flow and POC test implementation.

resultsAmong 121 observed patients, the total number of queues ranged from 4 to 7 and total visit times ranged from 0:14 (hours:minutes) to 7:38. Patients waited a mean of 2:05 for standard-of-care STI management, and approximately 4:56 for STI POC diagnostic testing. Stable HIV patients who collected antiretroviral therapy refills waited a mean of 2:42 in the standard queue and 2:26 in the fast-track queue. A rapid TB test on a small sample of patients with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and treatment initiation took a mean of 6:56, and 40% of patients presenting with TB-related symptoms were asked to return for an additional clinic visit to obtain test results. For all groups, the mean clinical assessment time with a nurse or physician was 7 to 9 min, which accounted for 2 to 6% of total visit time. Staff identified poor clinic flow and personnel shortages as areas of concern that may pose challenges to expanding POC tests in the current clinic environment.

conclusionsThis busy urban clinic had multiple patient queues, long clinical visits, and short clinical encounters. Although POC testing ensured patients received a diagnosis sooner, it more than doubled the time STI patients spent at the clinic and did not result in same-day diagnosis for all patients screened for TB. Further research on implementing POC testing efficiently into care pathways is required to make these promising assays a success.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAttitude of Health PersonnelEarly DiagnosisEfficiencyHIV InfectionsHumansPoint-of-Care TestingReferral and ConsultationSexually Transmitted DiseasesSouth AfricaTime-to-TreatmentTuberculosisDifferentiated careHIVImplementation sciencePoint-of-careSouth AfricaSTITB

Identifiers

PMID29751798
PMCPMC5948731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.