Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29751789›Full record

ReviewBMC cancer2018

Mechanisms of immune evasion in breast cancer.

Joshua P Bates, Roshanak Derakhshandeh, Laundette Jones, Tonya J Webb

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04689945 (Metabolomic Profiling of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Breast Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 167 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04689945 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Metabolomic Profiling of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Breast Cancer Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorDr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled91ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMorphine, Erector Spinae Block, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua P BatesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, 685 West Baltimore St; HSF I- Room 380, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Roshanak DerakhshandehDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, 685 West Baltimore St; HSF I- Room 380, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Laundette JonesDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Tonya J WebbDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, 685 West Baltimore St; HSF I- Room 380, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. twebb@som.umaryland.edu.

Funding

Generation of NKT cells from adult stem cells for adoptive immunotherapyR21CA184469 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WEBB, TONYA J. · 2015 to 2016
$367k
NKT cells with chimeric antigen receptorsR21CA199544 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WEBB, TONYA J. · 2015 to 2016
$367k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA184469NCI NIH HHS R21 CA199544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumors develop multiple mechanisms of immune evasion as they progress, with some cancer types being inherently better at 'hiding' than others. With an increased understanding of tumor immune surveillance, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment strategy for breast cancer, despite historically being thought of as an immunologically silent neoplasm. Some types of cancer, such as melanoma, bladder, and renal cell carcinoma, have demonstrated a durable response to immunotherapeutic intervention, however, breast neoplasms have not shown the same efficacy. The causes of breast cancer's immune silence derive from mechanisms that diminish immune recognition and others that promote strong immunosuppression. It is the mechanisms of immune evasion in breast cancers that are poorly defined. Thus, further characterization is critical for the development of better therapies. This brief review will seek to provide insight into the possible causes of weak immunogenicity and immune suppression mediated by breast cancers and highlight current immunotherapies being used to restore immune responses to breast cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansImmunologic SurveillanceImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeTumor EscapeTumor MicroenvironmentCytokinesDendritic cellsImmunityImmunotherapyLymphocytesMyeloid derived suppressor cellsPD-1Regulatory T cells

Identifiers

PMID29751789
PMCPMC5948714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.