Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29751763›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2018

Harm reduction and viral hepatitis C in European prisons: a cross-sectional survey of 25 countries.

Rob Bielen, Samya R Stumo, Rachel Halford, Klára Werling, Tatjana Reic, Heino Stöver, Geert Robaeys, Jeffrey V Lazarus

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. HIPPOCRATESWorld journal of hepatology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rob BielenFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Samya R StumoBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Carrer del Roselló, 132, 4th, ES-08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Rachel HalfordThe Hepatitis C Trust, London, UK.
Klára Werling2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tatjana ReicEuropean Liver Patients' Association (ELPA), Brussels, Belgium.
Heino StöverInstitute for Addiction Research, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt, Germany.
Geert RobaeysFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jeffrey V LazarusBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Carrer del Roselló, 132, 4th, ES-08036, Barcelona, Spain. jeffrey.lazarus@isglobal.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent estimates suggest that 15% of all prisoners worldwide are chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV), and this number is even higher in regions with high rates of injecting drug use. Although harm reduction services such as opioid substitution therapy (OST) and needle and syringe programs (NSPs) are effective in preventing the further spread of HCV and HIV, the extent to which these are available in prisons varies significantly across countries.

methodsThe Hep-CORE study surveyed liver patient groups from 25 European countries in 2016 and mid-2017 on national policies related to harm reduction, testing/screening, and treatment for HCV in prison settings. Results from the cross-sectional survey were compared to the data from available reports and the peer-reviewed literature to determine the overall degree to which European countries implement evidence-based HCV recommendations in prison settings.

resultsPatient groups in nine countries (36%) identified prisoners as a high-risk population target for HCV testing/screening. Twenty-one countries (84%) provide HCV treatment in prisons. However, the extent of coverage of these treatment programs varies widely. Two countries (8%) have NSPs officially available in prisons in all parts of the country. Eleven countries (44%) provide OST in prisons in all parts of the country without additional requirements.

conclusionDespite the existence of evidence-based recommendations, infectious disease prevention measures such as harm reduction programs are inadequate in European prison settings. Harm reduction, HCV testing/screening, and treatment should be scaled up in prison settings in order to progress towards eliminating HCV as a public health threat.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHealth PolicyHepatitis C, ChronicHumansMaleNeedle-Exchange ProgramsOpiate Substitution TreatmentPrevalencePrisonersPrisonsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-sectional surveyEuropeHarm reductionHepatitis CInjecting drug useNeedle and syringe programOpioid substitution therapyPolicy monitoringPrison health

Identifiers

PMID29751763
PMCPMC5948815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.