Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29751577›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Plant Perception and Short-Term Responses to Phytophagous Insects and Mites.

M Estrella Santamaria, Ana Arnaiz, Pablo Gonzalez-Melendi, Manuel Martinez, Isabel Diaz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genetic mapping and validation of QTL for whitefly resistance in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cyanogenesis, a Plant Defence Strategy against Herbivores.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of Resistance of Eleven Maize Races (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Opposite roles of MAPKKK17 and MAPKKK21 againstFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Estrella SantamariaCentro de Biotecnologia y Genomica de Plantas, Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus Montegancedo, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (UPM), Pozuelo de Alarcon, 28223 Madrid, Spain. me.santamaria@upm.es.ORCID 0000-0003-4999-6227
Ana ArnaizCentro de Biotecnologia y Genomica de Plantas, Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus Montegancedo, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (UPM), Pozuelo de Alarcon, 28223 Madrid, Spain. a.arnaiz@upm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3842-498X
Pablo Gonzalez-MelendiCentro de Biotecnologia y Genomica de Plantas, Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus Montegancedo, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (UPM), Pozuelo de Alarcon, 28223 Madrid, Spain. pablo.melendi@upm.es.ORCID 0000-0003-4355-4495
Manuel MartinezCentro de Biotecnologia y Genomica de Plantas, Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus Montegancedo, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (UPM), Pozuelo de Alarcon, 28223 Madrid, Spain. m.martinez@upm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-7826-5872
Isabel DiazCentro de Biotecnologia y Genomica de Plantas, Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus Montegancedo, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (UPM), Pozuelo de Alarcon, 28223 Madrid, Spain. i.diaz@upm.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9865-902X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant⁻pest relationships involve complex processes encompassing a network of molecules, signals, and regulators for overcoming defenses they develop against each other. Phytophagous arthropods identify plants mainly as a source of food. In turn, plants develop a variety of strategies to avoid damage and survive. The success of plant defenses depends on rapid and specific recognition of the phytophagous threat. Subsequently, plants trigger a cascade of short-term responses that eventually result in the production of a wide range of compounds with defense properties. This review deals with the main features involved in the interaction between plants and phytophagous insects and acari, focusing on early responses from the plant side. A general landscape of the diverse strategies employed by plants within the first hours after pest perception to block the capability of phytophagous insects to develop mechanisms of resistance is presented, with the potential of providing alternatives for pest control.

Indexed as

AnimalsInsectaLectinsMitesPlant ProteinsPlantsLectinsPlant Proteinsacariearly signalingeffectorselicitorsinsectphytophagous arthropodsplant defensesplant receptors

Identifiers

PMID29751577
PMCPMC5983831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.