ArticleMedicines (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Bibliometric Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Production between 1982 and 2016 Indexed in PubMed.
Article in Medicines (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interactions between cytochrome P450 enzymes and traditional Chinese herbs: A comprehensive review.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Review
- Comparative Bibliometric Analysis of Herbal Medicine Research in Chinese and Iranian Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Clinical Trials : Short title: Iranian and Chinese CAM Trials.Galen medical journal · 2026Article
- Progress in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma by integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Short-term and long-term effectiveness of acupuncture and Tuina on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- A bibliometric analysis of research on herbal medicine for obesity over the past 20 years.Medicine · 2022Article
- Cochrane systematic reviews on traditional Chinese medicine: What matters-the quantity or quality of evidence?Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2022Article
- Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Insight into the characteristics of research published in traditional, complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Understanding Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapeutics: An Overview of the Basics and Clinical Applications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.