Trial reportPloS one2018
Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Gene Factors and Serotypes Related to Polysaccharide and Protein-Based Candidate Vaccines AmongCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Improved detection of group BMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Evolving antimicrobial resistance patterns in group B streptococci: A five-year study in a high-risk pregnancy referral center in northeastern Brazil.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Article
- Genetic Determinants and Clonal Composition of Levofloxacin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence and genetic characteristics of lincosamide resistance genesMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Serotype distribution, virulence factors, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus) isolated from pregnant women in the Brazilian Amazon.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Genomic characterization of group BMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Antibiotic Resistance and Serotypes Distribution inPolish journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Increase in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. colonization among pregnant individuals during COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Macrolide resistance among Streptococcus agalactiae during COVID-19 public health emergency in Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Capsular gene distribution and RAPD typing of Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from pregnant women.AMB Express · 2024Article
- Anovaginal Colonization by Group BAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Distribution and Prevalence of Serotypes of Group BMaternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2023Article
- Changes in Group BPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- How GBS Got Its Hump: Genomic Analysis of Group BPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The landscape of antimicrobial resistance in the neonatal and multi-host pathogen group BFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance Profile and Associated Factors of Group B Streptococci Colonization among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in Jigjiga, Southeast Ethiopia.International journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance among Beta-HemolyticAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage by pregnant women is the primary risk factor for early-onset GBS neonatal sepsis. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) can prevent this transmission route, and two main approaches are recommended to base the selection of pregnant women to be submitted to IAP: the risk-based and the culture-based strategies. In Brazil, compliance to such recommendations is poor, and not much is known about GBS carriage. In the present study, 3,647 pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, were screened for GBS anogenital colonization, over a period of 8 years (2008-2015). GBS was detected in 956 (26.2%) of them, and presence of vaginal discharge was the only trait associated with a higher risk for GBS colonization. Serotypes Ia (257; 37.3%) and II (137; 19.9%) were the most frequent among 689 (72.1% of the total) GBS isolates evaluated, followed by NT isolates (84; 12.1%), serotype Ib (77; 11.1%), V (63; 9.1%), III (47; 6.8%) and IV (24; 3.5%). Estimated coverage of major serotype-based GBS vaccines currently under clinical trials would vary from 65.2% to 84.3%. All 689 isolates tested were susceptible to ampicillin and vancomycin. Resistance to chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline was observed in 5% (35), 2% (14), 14% (97), 5% (35) and 86% (592) of the isolates, respectively. No significant fluctuations in colonization rates, serotype distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were observed throughout the period of time investigated. The culture-based approach for IAP recommendation showed to be the best choice for the population investigated when compared to the risk-based, since the first did not increase the number of pregnant women submitted to antibiotic therapy and covered a larger number of women who were actually colonized by GBS. The fact the not all isolates were available for additional characterization, and serotype IX antiserum was not available for testing represent limitations of this study. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest investigation on GBS carriage among pregnant women in Brazil up to date, and results are useful for improving GBS prevention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.