Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29750199›Full record

ReviewScience advances2018

The Baltic Sea as a time machine for the future coastal ocean.

Thorsten B H Reusch, Jan Dierking, Helen C Andersson, Erik Bonsdorff, Jacob Carstensen, Michele Casini, Mikolaj Czajkowski, Berit Hasler, Klaus Hinsby, Kari Hyytiäinen and 17 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fungal parasites infecting NNature communications · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Thorsten B H ReuschGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Marine Ecology, Germany.
Jan DierkingGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Marine Ecology, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4660-6919
Helen C AnderssonSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden.
Erik BonsdorffAbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
Jacob CarstensenDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Michele CasiniDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lysekil, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4910-5236
Mikolaj CzajkowskiFaculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5118-2308
Berit HaslerDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-4086
Klaus HinsbyGeological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1190-4550
Kari HyytiäinenUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4366-0186
Kerstin JohannessonUniversity of Gothenburg, Tjärnö Marine Station, Strömstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0176-7986
Seifeddine JomaaDepartment of Aquatic Ecosystem Analysis and Management, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4782-9468
Veijo JormalainenUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6346-2585
Harri KuosaFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Sara KurlandDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-1236
Linda LaikreDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Brian R MacKenzieNational Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4798-0363
Piotr MargonskiNational Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Gdynia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8767-1880
Frank MelznerGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Marine Ecology, Germany.
Daniel OesterwindThuenen Institute-Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Rostock, Germany.
Henn OjaveerEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-2742-6063
Jens Christian RefsgaardGeological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0420-349X
Annica SandströmLulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden.
Gerald SchwarzThuenen Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany.
Karin TonderskiLinköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0722-6083
Monika WinderDepartment of Ecology, Environment, and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marianne ZandersenDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coastal global oceans are expected to undergo drastic changes driven by climate change and increasing anthropogenic pressures in coming decades. Predicting specific future conditions and assessing the best management strategies to maintain ecosystem integrity and sustainable resource use are difficult, because of multiple interacting pressures, uncertain projections, and a lack of test cases for management. We argue that the Baltic Sea can serve as a time machine to study consequences and mitigation of future coastal perturbations, due to its unique combination of an early history of multistressor disturbance and ecosystem deterioration and early implementation of cross-border environmental management to address these problems. The Baltic Sea also stands out in providing a strong scientific foundation and accessibility to long-term data series that provide a unique opportunity to assess the efficacy of management actions to address the breakdown of ecosystem functions. Trend reversals such as the return of top predators, recovering fish stocks, and reduced input of nutrient and harmful substances could be achieved only by implementing an international, cooperative governance structure transcending its complex multistate policy setting, with integrated management of watershed and sea. The Baltic Sea also demonstrates how rapidly progressing global pressures, particularly warming of Baltic waters and the surrounding catchment area, can offset the efficacy of current management approaches. This situation calls for management that is (i) conservative to provide a buffer against regionally unmanageable global perturbations, (ii) adaptive to react to new management challenges, and, ultimately, (iii) multisectorial and integrative to address conflicts associated with economic trade-offs.

Indexed as

EcosystemOceans and SeasBaltic StatesClimate ChangeEconomicsGeographyMarine BiologyModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID29750199
PMCPMC5942908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.