Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29750171›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription.

Jiahui Sun, Shuo Shi, Jinlu Li, Jing Yu, Ling Wang, Xueying Yang, Ling Guo, Shiliang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pollen Morphology inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Taxonomic notes onPhytoKeys · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2019
    Article
  18. Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiahui SunState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-5258
Shuo ShiState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8428-7261
Jinlu LiState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Jing YuState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Ling WangThe Department of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Xueying YangKey Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China.
Ling GuoBeijing Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-7442
Shiliang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5013-5497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maleae consists of economically and ecologically important plants. However, there are considerable disputes on generic circumscription due to the lack of a reliable phylogeny at generic level. In this study, molecular phylogeny of 35 generally accepted genera in Maleae is established using 15 chloroplast regions.

Indexed as

ChloroplastsDNA, ChloroplastDNA, PlantEvolution, MolecularMalusPhylogenyRosaceaeSequence Analysis, DNADNA, ChloroplastDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID29750171
PMCPMC5884435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.