Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29750145›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of genomics2018

Calibrating Transcriptional Activity Using Constitutive Synthetic Promoters in Mutants for Global Regulators in

Ananda Sanches-Medeiros, Lummy Maria Oliveira Monteiro, Rafael Silva-Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimization of Constitutive Promoters Using a Promoter-Trapping Vector inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Current landscape and future directions of synthetic biology in South America.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ananda Sanches-MedeirosSystems and Synthetic Biology Lab, FMRP - University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Lummy Maria Oliveira MonteiroSystems and Synthetic Biology Lab, FMRP - University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Rafael Silva-RochaSystems and Synthetic Biology Lab, FMRP - University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6319-631X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The engineering of synthetic circuits in cells relies on the use of well-characterized biological parts that would perform predicted functions under the situation considered, and many efforts have been taken to set biological standards that could define the basic features of these parts. However, since most synthetic biology projects usually require a particular cellular chassis and set of growth conditions, defining standards in the field is not a simple task as gene expression measurements could be affected severely by genetic background and culture conditions. In this study, we addressed promoter parameterization in bacteria in different genetic backgrounds and growth conditions. We found that a small set of constitutive promoters of different strengths controlling a short-lived GFP reporter placed in a low-copy number plasmid produces remarkably reproducible results that allow for the calibration of promoter activity over different genetic backgrounds and physiological conditions, thus providing a simple way to set standards of promoter activity in bacteria. Based on these results, we proposed the utilization of synthetic constitutive promoters as tools for calibration for the standardization of biological parts, in a way similar to the use of DNA and protein ladders in molecular biology as references for comparison with samples of interest.

Identifiers

PMID29750145
PMCPMC5884034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.