ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2018
Exploiting Lightweight Statistical Learning for Event-Based Vision Processing.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A privacy-preserving scheme with multi-level regulation compliance for blockchain.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A High-Speed Low-Cost VLSI System Capable of On-Chip Online Learning for Dynamic Vision Sensor Data Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a lightweight statistical learning framework potentially suitable for low-cost event-based vision systems, where visual information is captured by a dynamic vision sensor (DVS) and represented as an asynchronous stream of pixel addresses (events) indicating a relative intensity change on those locations. A simple random ferns classifier based on randomly selected patch-based binary features is employed to categorize pixel event flows. Our experimental results demonstrate that compared to existing event-based processing algorithms, such as spiking convolutional neural networks (SCNNs) and the state-of-the-art bag-of-events (BoE)-based statistical algorithms, our framework excels in high processing speed (2× faster than the BoE statistical methods and >100× faster than previous SCNNs in training speed) with extremely simple online learning process, and achieves state-of-the-art classification accuracy on four popular address-event representation data sets: MNIST-DVS, Poker-DVS, Posture-DVS, and CIFAR10-DVS. Hardware estimation shows that our algorithm will be preferable for low-cost embedded system implementations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.