Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29750029›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2018

Mortality in COPD patients according to clinical phenotypes.

Rafael Golpe, María Suárez-Valor, Irene Martín-Robles, Pilar Sanjuán-López, Esteban Cano-Jiménez, Olalla Castro-Añón, Luis A Pérez de Llano

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Respiratory Oscillometry and Functional Performance in Different COPD Phenotypes.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Article
  5. RETRO-POPE: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Real-World Study of All-Cause Mortality in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Update on Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO): A Narrative Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rafael GolpeRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
María Suárez-ValorRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Irene Martín-RoblesRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Pilar Sanjuán-LópezRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Esteban Cano-JiménezRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Olalla Castro-AñónRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Luis A Pérez de LlanoRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Grouping COPD subjects into clinical phenotypes might be useful for the management of the disease, but the clinical implications of such classification are still not totally clear, especially regarding prognosis. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether the mortality rates were different between four predefined clinical phenotypes. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective, observational study carried out at the COPD clinic of a University Hospital. A total of 891 COPD patients were classified, according to the Spanish COPD guidelines, into the following four phenotypes: asthma-COPD overlap (ACO; 75 subjects), nonexacerbator (NONEX; 531 subjects), exacerbator with chronic bronchitis (EXCB; 194 subjects), and exacerbator with emphysema (EXEMPH; 91 subjects). We compared the mortality outcomes between the phenotypes. Results: After a follow-up of 48.4±25.2 months, there were 194 deaths (21.8%). There were significant differences in all-cause mortality between phenotypes. The ACO phenotype had the best long-term prognosis, whereas EXEMPH had the highest risk of death. NONEX and EXCB mortality figures were in between the other two groups. We also found some differences in the causes of death, and patients with EXEMPH were at a higher risk of dying because of COPD itself. The differences in mortality did not seem related to the classification into phenotypes in itself but to disparities in COPD severity and comorbidity load between groups. Conclusion: Classifying COPD patients according to several predefined clinical phenotypes can identify clusters of subjects with different mortality outcomes. Some phenotypes are associated with a specific cause of death. The mechanisms that underlie these differences seem to be related to COPD severity and comorbidities.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaBronchitis, ChronicCause of DeathComorbidityFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLungMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrevalencePrognosisCOPDmortalityphenotypes

Identifiers

PMID29750029
PMCPMC5936010
OpenAlexW2801632452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.