Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29749852›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2018

EcoEvo-MAPS: An Ecology and Evolution Assessment for Introductory through Advanced Undergraduates.

Mindi M Summers, Brian A Couch, Jennifer K Knight, Sara E Brownell, Alison J Crowe, Katharine Semsar, Christian D Wright, Michelle K Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Examining Science Practices in an Introductory Biology Laboratory Curriculum.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Resources for Teaching and Assessing theCBE life sciences education · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mindi M SummersDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Brian A CouchSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588.
Jennifer K KnightMolecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Sara E BrownellSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Alison J CroweDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.
Katharine SemsarMiramontes Arts and Sciences Program, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Christian D WrightSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Michelle K SmithSchool of Biology and Ecology, University Maine, Orono, ME 04469.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new assessment tool, Ecology and Evolution-Measuring Achievement and Progression in Science or EcoEvo-MAPS, measures student thinking in ecology and evolution during an undergraduate course of study. EcoEvo-MAPS targets foundational concepts in ecology and evolution and uses a novel approach that asks students to evaluate a series of predictions, conclusions, or interpretations as likely or unlikely to be true given a specific scenario. We collected evidence of validity and reliability for EcoEvo-MAPS through an iterative process of faculty review, student interviews, and analyses of assessment data from more than 3000 students at 34 associate's-, bachelor's-, master's-, and doctoral-granting institutions. The 63 likely/unlikely statements range in difficulty and target student understanding of key concepts aligned with the Vision and Change report. This assessment provides departments with a tool to measure student thinking at different time points in the curriculum and provides data that can be used to inform curricular and instructional modifications.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEducational MeasurementStudentsCurriculumEcologyFacultyHumansMotivationReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29749852
PMCPMC5998322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.