Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29749656›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2018

Establishment of reference values of the caudal vena cava by fast-ultrasonography through different views in healthy dogs.

Elodie Darnis, Soren Boysen, Anne-Christine Merveille, Loïc Desquilbet, Serge Chalhoub, Kris Gommeren

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05220891 (Comparison of Crystalloid and Colloid I.V Fluid Therapy in Prevention of Paracentesis Induced Circulatory Dysfunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05220891 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Crystalloid and Colloid I.V Fluid Therapy in Prevention of Paracentesis Induced Circulatory Dysfunction (PICD) and Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis in Egypt: a Randomized Piolet Study

TypeobservationalSponsorShady Ashraf KassemRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsAscitesArmsParacentesis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elodie DarnisDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3433-0767
Soren BoysenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnotic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-4834
Anne-Christine MerveilleDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium.
Loïc DesquilbetU955-IMRB, INSERM, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, UPEC, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Serge ChalhoubDepartment of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnotic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.
Kris GommerenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BEUniversity of Calgary · CAInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical assessment of intravascular volume status is challenging. In humans, ultrasonographic assessment of the inferior vena cava diameter, directly or as a ratio to the aortic diameter is used to estimate intravascular volume status.

objectivesTo ultrasonographically obtain reference values (RV) for caudal vena cava diameter (CVC ANIMALS: One hundred and twenty-six healthy adult dogs from clients, students, faculty, or staff.

methodsProspective, multicenter, observational study. Two observer pairs evaluated CVC

resultsThe CCC was ≤0.43 for the CVC/aorta ratio at the PV and ≤0.43 in both inspiration and expiration for CVC at the SV. The RVs using allometric scaling for CVC CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The CVC

Indexed as

AnimalsDogsFemaleMaleReference ValuesUltrasonographyVena Cava, Inferiorallometric scalingcaudal vena cavaFAST echographyintravascular volume status

Identifiers

PMID29749656
PMCPMC6060313
OpenAlexW2799675021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.