Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29749540›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2018

Personalized regulation of glioblastoma cancer stem cells based on biomedical technologies: From theory to experiment (Review).

Igor Bryukhovetskiy, Arina Ponomarenko, Irina Lyakhova, Sergey Zaitsev, Yulia Zayats, Maria Korneyko, Marina Eliseikina, Polina Mischenko, Valerie Shevchenko, Hari Shanker Sharma and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Igor BryukhovetskiyFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Arina PonomarenkoFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Irina LyakhovaFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Sergey ZaitsevFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Yulia ZayatsFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Maria KorneykoFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Marina EliseikinaNational Scientific Center of Marine Biology of Far Eastern Branch of The Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690059, Russia.
Polina MischenkoFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Valerie ShevchenkoFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Hari Shanker SharmaInternational Experimental CNS Injury & Repair (IECNSIR), Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE‑75185, Sweden.
Aruna SharmaInternational Experimental CNS Injury & Repair (IECNSIR), Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE‑75185, Sweden.
Yuri KhotimchenkoFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690091, Russia.
Far Eastern Federal University · RUUppsala University Hospital · SEA.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive brain tumors. GBM represents >50% of primary tumors of the nervous system and ~20% of intracranial neoplasms. Standard treatment involves surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. However, the prognosis of GBM is usually poor, with a median survival of 15 months. Resistance of GBM to treatment can be explained by the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) among the GBM cell population. At present, there are no effective therapeutic strategies for the elimination of CSCs. The present review examined the nature of human GBM therapeutic resistance and attempted to systematize and put forward novel approaches for a personalized therapy of GBM that not only destroys tumor tissue, but also regulates cellular signaling and the morphogenetic properties of CSCs. The CSCs are considered to be an informationally accessible living system, and the CSC proteome should be used as a target for therapy directed at suppressing clonal selection mechanisms and CSC generation, destroying CSC hierarchy, and disrupting the interaction of CSCs with their microenvironment and extracellular matrix. These objectives can be achieved through the use of biomedical cellular products.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomedical TechnologyBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsPrecision MedicinePrognosisTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID29749540
PMCPMC6034919
OpenAlexW2802407574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.