Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29749384›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

3D confocal laser-scanning microscopy for large-area imaging of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus.

Stephan Allgeier, Andreas Bartschat, Sebastian Bohn, Sabine Peschel, Klaus-Martin Reichert, Karsten Sperlich, Marcus Walckling, Veit Hagenmeyer, Ralf Mikut, Oliver Stachs and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-contact confocal calcium imaging ofBiomedical optics express · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of dynamic corneal nerve changes using static landmarks byQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current View of Diagnosing Small Fiber Neuropathy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2021
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. CellularBiomedical optics express · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephan AllgeierInstitute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany. stephan.allgeier@kit.edu.
Andreas BartschatInstitute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Sebastian BohnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Sabine PeschelAugenarztpraxis Spremberg, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum-Poliklinik GmbH (MVZ), Cottbus, Germany.
Klaus-Martin ReichertInstitute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Karsten SperlichDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Marcus WalcklingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Veit HagenmeyerInstitute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ralf MikutInstitute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9100-5496
Oliver StachsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Bernd KöhlerInstitute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEUniversity of Rostock · DECarl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capability of corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to acquire high-resolution in vivo images of the densely innervated human cornea has gained considerable interest in using this non-invasive technique as an objective diagnostic tool for staging peripheral neuropathies. Morphological alterations of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus (SNP) assessed by CCM have been shown to correlate well with the progression of neuropathic diseases and even predict future-incident neuropathy. Since the field of view of single CCM images is insufficient for reliable characterisation of nerve morphology, several image mosaicking techniques have been developed to facilitate the assessment of the SNP in large-area visualisations. Due to the limited depth of field of confocal microscopy, these approaches are highly sensitive to small deviations of the focus plane from the SNP layer. Our contribution proposes a new automated solution, combining guided eye movements for rapid expansion of the acquired SNP area and axial focus plane oscillations to guarantee complete imaging of the SNP. We present results of a feasibility study using the proposed setup to evaluate different oscillation settings. By comparing different image selection approaches, we show that automatic tissue classification algorithms are essential to create high-quality mosaic images from the acquired 3D datasets.

Indexed as

CorneaEquipment DesignHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, ConfocalNerve Fibers

Identifiers

PMID29749384
PMCPMC5945773
OpenAlexW2799405016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.