Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29749360›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2018

Utility of cystatin C as a potential bladder tumour biomarker confirmed by surface plasmon resonance technique.

Anna Tokarzewicz, Tomasz Guszcz, Anna Onopiuk, Robert Kozlowski, Ewa Gorodkiewicz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of cystatin C in urogenital malignancy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna TokarzewiczDepartment of Electrochemistry, Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Tomasz GuszczDepartment of Urology, J. Sniadecki Provincial Hospital of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Anna OnopiukDepartment of Technique & Food Development, Division of Food Research & Development, Faculty of Human Nutrition & Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Robert KozlowskiDepartment of Urology, J. Sniadecki Provincial Hospital of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Ewa GorodkiewiczDepartment of Electrochemistry, Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony im. Jędrzeja Śniadeckiego · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectivesThe determination of cystatin C (cysC) may be helpful in diagnosis and monitoring of cancer because the pathogenesis of cancer is linked with an increased activity of cysteine peptidases (cathepsins) and a decrease of cysC concentration. This study was aimed to examine the utility of cysC as a marker of bladder cancer (BCa) to be used in the diagnosis.

methodsThis study was conducted with 90 patients with BCa and 27 healthy people. Patients with other cancers, inflammation process and impaired renal function were excluded from the study. The concentrations of cysC in the plasma and urine were measured by surface plasmon resonance imaging technique.

resultsThe concentration of cysC in the serum taken from the patients with BCa [0.35±0.02 μg/ml (range: 0.20-0.78 μg/ml)] was significantly (P<0.001) lower than the serum cysC concentration of the healthy people [0.68±0.05 μg/ml (range: 0.52-0.89 μg/ml)]. The urinary cysC concentration of the BCa patients [0.19±0.01 μg/ml (range: 0.09-0.34 μg/ml)] was not significantly different from the urinary cysC concentration of the healthy people [0.24±0.02 μg/ml (range: 0.16-0.33 μg/ml)]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that BCa patients with cysC concentration <0.54 μg/ml [sensitivity: 87%; specificity: 92%; area under the curve (AUC) of ROC: 0.927; P=0.02] could be optimally separated from healthy people. The ROC curve further showed that superficial low-grade patients with cysC concentration lower than 0.36 μg/ml (sensitivity: 0.63%; specificity: 0.58%; AUC of ROC: 0.635; P=0.08) could not be optimally separated from high-risk tumour patients. INTERPRETATION &

conclusionsBCa patients have lower serum cysC concentration than the control group. Serum cysC may be considered as a potential marker of BCa but not its aggressiveness.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCreatinineCystatin CFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurface Plasmon ResonanceUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCreatinineCST3 protein, humanCystatin CBiomarkersbladder cancercystatin Csurface plasmon resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29749360
PMCPMC5967216
OpenAlexW2801961882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.