Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29749129›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2018

Plasma Cell-Free DNA as a Predictive Marker after Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Sangjoon Park, Eun Jung Lee, Chai Hong Rim, Jinsil Seong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Utility of Liquid Biopsy Analysis in Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Determination of Prognosis, and Disease Monitoring: A Systematic Review.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Is Cell-Free DNA Testing in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ready for Prime Time?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cell-Free DNA: Hope and Potential Application in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sangjoon ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-3172
Eun Jung LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chai Hong RimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jinsil SeongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. JSSEONG@yuhs.ac.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1794-5951
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCell-free DNA (cfDNA) is gaining attention as a novel biomarker for oncologic outcomes. We investigated the clinical significance of cfDNA in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-five patients with HCC who received RT were recruited from two prospective study cohorts: one cohort of 34 patients who underwent conventionally fractionated RT and a second of 21 patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. cfDNA was extracted and quantified.

resultsIn total, 30% of the patients had multiple tumors, 77% had tumors >2 cm, and 32% had portal vein tumor thrombus. Optimal cut-off values for cfDNA levels (33.65 ng/mL and 37.25 ng/mL, before and after RT) were used to divide patients into low-DNA (LDNA) and high-DNA (HDNA) groups. The pre-RT HDNA group tended to have more advanced disease and larger tumors (p=0.049 and p=0.017, respectively). Tumor response, intrahepatic failure-free rates, and local control (LC) rates were significantly better in the post-RT LDNA group (p=0.017, p=0.035, and p=0.006, respectively).

conclusionQuantitative analysis of cfDNA was feasible in our cohorts. Post-RT cfDNA levels were negatively correlated with treatment outcomes, indicating the potential for the use of post-RT cfDNA levels as an early predictor of treatment responses and LC after RT for HCC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNADNAFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPortal VeinProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNADNABiomarkerscell-free DNAhepatocellular carcinomaradiotherapytreatmenttumor

Identifiers

PMID29749129
PMCPMC5949288
OpenAlexW2800505831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.