Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29749108›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2018

Biomaterial characterization of off-the-shelf decellularized porcine pericardial tissue for use in prosthetic valvular applications.

Joshua A Choe, Soumen Jana, Brandon J Tefft, Ryan S Hennessy, Jason Go, David Morse, Amir Lerman, Melissa D Young

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biological Scaffolds for Congenital Heart Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua A ChoeDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4757-8849
Soumen JanaDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brandon J TefftDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ryan S HennessyDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jason GoDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David MorseDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amir LermanDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Melissa D YoungDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-4999
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

CARDIOVASOLOGYT32HL007111 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Barry A. Borlaug · 1985 to 2026
$8.7M
Automated patient specific artery modeling using ultrasound virtual histologyR01EB018965 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI YOUNG, MELISSA DENTON · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fixed pericardial tissue is commonly used for commercially available xenograft valve implants, and has proven durability, but lacks the capability to remodel and grow. Decellularized porcine pericardial tissue has the promise to outperform fixed tissue and remodel, but the decellularization process has been shown to damage the collagen structure and reduce mechanical integrity of the tissue. Therefore, a comparison of uniaxial tensile properties was performed on decellularized, decellularized-sterilized, fixed, and native porcine pericardial tissue versus native valve leaflet cusps. The results of non-parametric analysis showed statistically significant differences (p < .05) between the stiffness of decellularized versus native pericardium and native cusps as well as fixed tissue, respectively; however, decellularized tissue showed large increases in elastic properties. Porosity testing of the tissues showed no statistical difference between decellularized and decell-sterilized tissue compared with native cusps (p > .05). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that valvular endothelial and interstitial cells colonized the decellularized pericardial surface when seeded and grown for 30 days in static culture. Collagen assays and transmission electron microscopy analysis showed limited reductions in collagen with processing; yet glycosaminoglycan assays showed great reductions in the processed pericardium relative to native cusps. Decellularized pericardium had comparatively low mechanical properties among the groups studied; yet the stiffness was comparatively similar to the native cusps and demonstrated a lack of cytotoxicity. Suture retention, accelerated wear, and hydrodynamic testing of prototype decellularized and decell-sterilized valves showed positive functionality. Sterilized tissue could mimic valvular mechanical environment in vitro, therefore making it a viable potential candidate for off-the-shelf tissue-engineered valvular applications.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisMaterials TestingAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCells, CulturedPericardiumSwineTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsbiomechanicsdecellularizationheart valvespericardial tissuesterilizationtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID29749108
PMCPMC6055610
OpenAlexW2800299171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.