Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29749101›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2018

Understanding Patient Adherence and Concerns with STatins and MedicatION Discussions With Physicians (ACTION): A survey on the patient perspective of dialogue with healthcare providers regarding statin therapy.

Eliot A Brinton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2022 · on this map
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eliot A BrintonUtah Lipid Center, Salt Lake City.
Lipocine (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatins are first-line for cholesterol lowering and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but their use is complicated by side effects and potential for drug-drug interactions. Provider-patient communication is the basis of the recommended shared decision-making, but relatively little is known about this in the context of statin use.

methodsWe surveyed 5014 US adults prescribed a statin for hypercholesterolemia to learn their perspectives on communication with their provider.

resultsNinety-four percent reported currently taking a statin while 6% had stopped. Past users vs current users were more likely to be female, age < 65 years, and to have fewer cardiovascular disease-related comorbidities (hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and coronary heart disease, respectively). Although 93% of current statin users were taking ≥1 other prescription medications (median of 4), 76% were "not at all"/"not very concerned" about potential drug-drug interactions with their statin, and fewer than one-quarter recalled mention of these from their provider. Ninety-five percent of subjects said it was "extremely"/"somewhat" important that their healthcare provider take "an individualized approach to selecting the right statin," but 73% and 76%, respectively, said their statin choice was made with little or no input from them. Only 25% were told that "some statins might be more likely than others to interact with other medications," and only 18% (and only 20% of past users) were told that "their particular statin might interact with other medications."

conclusionProvider-patient communication regarding statin therapy appears inadequate, by patient recall, and efforts to improve it are warranted.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedication AdherencePhysician-Patient RelationsAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterolComorbidityDown-RegulationDrug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug SubstitutionFemaleHealth Care SurveysBiomarkersCholesterolHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCholesterolHMG-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolemiaLow-Density Lipoprotein CholesterolStatin AdherenceStatins

Identifiers

PMID29749101
PMCPMC6490009
OpenAlexW2802528260

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.