ArticleTopics in cognitive science2018
Miscommunication in Doctor-Patient Communication.
Article in Topics in cognitive science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of WHO-recommended antenatal care visits, ultrasonography, and health education in reducing unnecessary caesarean sections among pregnant women in Bangladesh: a hospital-based randomised controlled trial.Journal of global health · 2025Trial
- Association between the frequency of treating foreign patients and the cultural competency of Japanese healthcare professionals: a mixed-method study.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Article
- Analysis of the causes of improper medical decision-making in medical damage liability disputes in China: a text mining approach.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Development of a rapid screener to elicit patient preferences for antiseizure medication discontinuation.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2025Article
- Assessing quality of health care in the context of patient satisfaction from patients' perspective among a physical therapy and rehabilitation unit.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients during Teleconsultation: A Scoping Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Bridging the digital divide: Enhancing doctor-patient communication through digital media platforms.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- The TouCAN Codebook: Detecting textual misunderstanding in doctor-patient communication with the philosophy of language tools.PloS one · 2025Article
- How Informal Carers Support Video Consulting in Physiotherapy, Heart Failure, and Cancer: Qualitative Study Using Linguistic Ethnography.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A meta-narrative review of coding tools for healthcare interactions and their applicability to written communication.PEC innovation · 2023Review
- Narrative medicine in clinical internship teaching practice.Medical education online · 2023Article
- Survey-identified experiences of prediagnosis and diagnosis process among patients with COPD, asthma, interstitial lung disease and bronchiectasis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2023Article
- The Influence of Individualized Three-Dimensional Holographic Models on Patients' Knowledge Qualified for Intervention in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD).Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Healthcare's New Horizon With ChatGPT's Voice and Vision Capabilities: A Leap Beyond Text.Cureus · 2023Article
- Automated Strategy Feedback Can Improve the Readability of Physicians' Electronic Communications to Simulated Patients.International journal of human-computer studies · 2023Article
- Patients' Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed "Patients' Guide for Doctor's Visit": DocVISITguide.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Death education for Palliative care: a european project for University students.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- The Lübeck Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire-A Novel Measurement Tool for Therapy Satisfaction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The effectiveness of medical treatment depends on the quality of the patient-clinician relationship. It has been proposed that this depends on the extent to which the patient and clinician build a shared understanding of illness and treatment. Here, we use the tools of conversation analysis (CA) to explore this idea in the context of psychiatric consultations. The CA "repair" framework provides an analysis of the processes people use to deal with problems in speaking, hearing, and understanding. These problems are especially critical in the treatment of psychosis where patients and health care professionals need to communicate about the disputed meaning of hallucinations and delusion. Patients do not feel understood, they are frequently non-adherent with treatment, and many have poor outcomes. We present an overview of two studies focusing on the role of repair as a mechanism for producing and clarifying meaning in psychiatrist-patient communication and its association with treatment outcomes. The first study shows patient clarification or repair of psychiatrists' talk is associated with better patient adherence to treatment. The second study shows that training which emphasizes the importance of building an understanding of patients' psychotic experiences increases psychiatrists' self-repair. We propose that psychiatrists are working harder to make their talk understandable and acceptable to the patient by taking the patient's perspective into account. We conclude that these findings provide evidence that repair is an important mechanism for building shared understanding in doctor-patient communication and contributes to better therapeutic relationships and treatment adherence. The conversation analytic account of repair is currently the most sophisticated empirical model for analyzing how people construct shared meaning and understanding. Repair appears to reflect greater commitment to and engagement in communication and improve both the quality and outcomes of communication. Reducing potential miscommunication between psychiatrists and their patients with psychosis is a low-cost means of enhancing treatment from both the psychiatrist and patient perspective. Given that misunderstanding and miscommunication are particularly problematic in psychosis, this is critical for improving the longer term outcomes of treatment for these patients who often have poor relationships with psychiatrists and health care services more widely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.