Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29748997›Full record

ReviewCellular microbiology2018

The recycling endosome and bacterial pathogens.

Samual C Allgood, M Ramona Neunuebel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Phosphate (Pi) Transporter PIT1 Induces Pi Starvation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Protein sociology of ProA, Mip and other secreted virulence factors at theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Targeting Endosomal Recycling Pathways by Bacterial and Viral Pathogens.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. The Endosomal Recycling Pathway-At the Crossroads of the Cell.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samual C AllgoodDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
M Ramona NeunuebelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3113-7144
University of Delaware · US

Funding

Predictive Modeling & Optimal Control Framework for Model-Based Epidemic Response in DelawareP20GM103446 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI MELINDA K DUNCAN · 2012 to 2026
$67.2M
This renovation project will create over 1455 sq. ft. of state- of-the-art reseaP20GM104316 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI SCHMITZ, KARL ROBERT · 2014 to 2024
$26.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103446NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial pathogens have developed a wide range of strategies to survive within human cells. A number of pathogens multiply in a vacuolar compartment, whereas others can rupture the vacuole and replicate in the host cytosol. A common theme among many bacterial pathogens is the use of specialised secretion systems to deliver effector proteins into the host cell. These effectors can manipulate the host's membrane trafficking pathways to remodel the vacuole into a replication-permissive niche and prevent degradation. As master regulators of eukaryotic membrane traffic, Rab GTPases are principal targets of bacterial effectors. This review highlights the manipulation of Rab GTPases that regulate host recycling endocytosis by several bacterial pathogens, including Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Uropathogenic Escherichia coli, and Legionella pneumophila. Recycling endocytosis plays key roles in a variety of cellular aspects such as nutrient uptake, immunity, cell division, migration, and adhesion. Though much remains to be understood about the molecular basis and the biological relevance of bacterial pathogens exploiting Rab GTPases, current knowledge supports the notion that endocytic recycling Rab GTPases are differentially targeted to avoid degradation and support bacterial replication. Thus, future studies of the interactions between bacterial pathogens and host endocytic recycling pathways are poised to deepen our understanding of bacterial survival strategies.

Indexed as

EndocytosisHost-Pathogen InteractionsEndosomesGram-Negative BacteriaHumansrab GTP-Binding Proteinsrab GTP-Binding Proteinsbacterial effectorsintravacuolar pathogensRab GTPasesrecycling endocytosis

Identifiers

PMID29748997
PMCPMC5993623
OpenAlexW2801062848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.