SynthesisSurgery today2019
Training for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Synthesis in Surgery today, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.Cancers · 2026Review
- Application of pancreaticojejunostomy without suturing main pancreatic duct in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for small main pancreatic duct (≤ 3 mm).Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with combined venous vascular resection: A comparative analysis with open approach.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024Article
- Various retraction techniques for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Objective assessment for open surgical suturing training by finger tracking can discriminate novices from experts.Medical education online · 2023Article
- First assistant experience in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: accelerating the learning curve for an operator.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary tumors: a learning curve analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Hybrid pancreatoduodenectomy in laparoscopic and robotic surgery: a single-center experience in China.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, laparoscopic procedures have developed rapidly, and the reports of laparoscopic pancreatic resection including laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) have increased in number. Although LPD is a complex procedure with high mortality, the training system for LPD remains unestablished. Ensuring patient safety is extremely important, even in challenging surgeries such a LPD. At present, several tools have been developed for surgical education to ensure patient safety preoperatively, such as video learning, virtual reality simulators, and cadaver training. Although LPD is reported as a safe and feasible choice, LPD is still a challenging operation. An LPD training system should be established with a board-certified system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29748825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.