Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29748824›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

Cross-national health comparisons using the Rasch model: findings from the 2012 US Health and Retirement Study and the 2012 Mexican Health and Aging Study.

Ickpyo Hong, Timothy A Reistetter, Carlos Díaz-Venegas, Alejandra Michaels-Obregon, Rebeca Wong

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developing a Cross-National Disability Measure for Older Adult Populations across Korea, China, and Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Development of a physical function outcome measure to harmonize comparisons between three Asian adult populations.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ickpyo HongDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555-1142, USA. ichong@utmb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5404-7646
Timothy A ReistetterDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555-1142, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1732-5533
Carlos Díaz-VenegasMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5802-6260
Alejandra Michaels-ObregonSealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Rebeca WongSealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-0660

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
The Mexican Health and Aging Study - IIR01AG018016 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI Rebeca Wong · 1999 to 2026
$22.6M
National Institute on Aging U01AG009740NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018016NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCross-national comparisons of patterns of population aging have emerged as comparable national micro-data have become available. This study creates a metric using Rasch analysis and determines the health of American and Mexican older adult populations.

methodsSecondary data analysis using representative samples aged 50 and older from 2012 U.S. Health and Retirement Study (n = 20,554); 2012 Mexican Health and Aging Study (n = 14,448). We developed a function measurement scale using Rasch analysis of 22 daily tasks and physical function questions. We tested psychometrics of the scale including factor analysis, fit statistics, internal consistency, and item difficulty. We investigated differences in function using multiple linear regression controlling for demographics. Lastly, we conducted subgroup analyses for chronic conditions.

resultsThe created common metric demonstrated a unidimensional structure with good item fit, an acceptable precision (person reliability = 0.78), and an item difficulty hierarchy. The American adults appeared less functional than adults in Mexico (β = - 0.26, p < 0.0001) and across two chronic conditions (arthritis, β = - 0.36; lung problems, β = - 0.62; all p < 0.05). However, American adults with stroke were more functional than Mexican adults (β = 0.46, p = 0.047).

conclusionsThe Rasch model indicates that Mexican adults were more functional than Americans at the population level and across two chronic conditions (arthritis and lung problems). Future studies would need to elucidate other factors affecting the function differences between the two countries.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMaleMexican AmericansMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsRetirementUnited StatesCross-cultural comparisonDisabilityHealthOutcome measureRasch model

Identifiers

PMID29748824
PMCPMC6113084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.