Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29748648›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2018

High-yield in vitro recordings from neurons functionally characterized in vivo.

Simon Weiler, Joel Bauer, Mark Hübener, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Tobias Rose, Volker Scheuss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A hybrid compass mechanism combining radical pairs and magnetite crystals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In vivo extracellular recordings of thalamic and cortical visual responses reveal V1 connectivity rules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bioinspired neuron-like electronics.Nature materials · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon WeilerMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, München-Martinsried, Germany.
Joel BauerMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, München-Martinsried, Germany.
Mark HübenerMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, München-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8367-9132
Tobias BonhoefferMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, München-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-6634
Tobias RoseMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, München-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7156-4714
Volker ScheussMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, München-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0659-3228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo two-photon calcium imaging provides detailed information about the activity and response properties of individual neurons. However, in vitro methods are often required to study the underlying neuronal connectivity and physiology at the cellular and synaptic levels at high resolution. This protocol provides a fast and reliable workflow for combining the two approaches by characterizing the response properties of individual neurons in mice in vivo using genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs), followed by retrieval of the same neurons in brain slices for further analysis in vitro (e.g., circuit mapping). In this approach, a reference frame is provided by fluorescent-bead tracks and sparsely transduced neurons expressing a structural marker in order to re-identify the same neurons. The use of GECIs provides a substantial advancement over previous approaches by allowing for repeated in vivo imaging. This opens the possibility of directly correlating experience-dependent changes in neuronal activity and feature selectivity with changes in neuronal connectivity and physiology. This protocol requires expertise both in in vivo two-photon calcium imaging and in vitro electrophysiology. It takes 3 weeks or more to complete, depending on the time allotted for repeated in vivo imaging of neuronal activity.

Indexed as

Calcium SignalingAnimalsCell SeparationIntravital MicroscopyMiceMolecular BiologyNeuronsOptical ImagingStaining and Labeling

Identifiers

PMID29748648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.