Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29748365›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2018

Clinical Experience With Regenerative Therapy in Heart Failure: Advancing Care With Cardiopoietic Stem Cell Interventions.

Jozef Bartunek, Andre Terzic, Atta Behfar, William Wijns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Stem cell therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mass Customized Outlook for Regenerative Heart Failure Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Brachyury engineers cardiac repair competent stem cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Regenerative medicine clinical readiness.Regenerative medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Regenerative Horizon: Opportunities for Nursing Research and Practice.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2019
    Article
  17. [Nuclear medicine and biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jozef BartunekFrom the Cardiovascular Center, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium (J.B.) jozef.bartunek@olvz-aalst.be terzic.andre@mayo.edu.
Andre TerzicDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Rochester, MN (A.T., A.B.).
Atta BehfarDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Rochester, MN (A.T., A.B.).
William WijnsLambe Institute for Translational Medicine, Curam, National University of Ireland Galway, Saolta University Healthcare Group (W.W.).

Funding

CARDIOVASOLOGYT32HL007111 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Barry A. Borlaug · 1985 to 2026
$8.7M
ENHANCING CARDIOPOIETIC REGENERATION FOR ISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHYR01HL134664 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TERZIC, ANDRE · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134664NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationClinical Trials as TopicDouble-Blind MethodEquipment DesignGene Expression ProfilingHeart FailureHumansIntersectoral CollaborationNeedlesRegenerative MedicineStroke Volumeheartheart failuremyocardial infarctionphenotypestandard of care

Identifiers

PMID29748365
PMCPMC6089255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.