Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29748233›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2018

Prospective Study of Serial

Lanell M Peterson, Janet O'Sullivan, Qian Vicky Wu, Alena Novakova-Jiresova, Isaac Jenkins, Jean H Lee, Andrew Shields, Susan Montgomery, Hannah M Linden, Julie Gralow and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2022
    Trial
  3. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparison ofScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Repeatability ofEJNMMI research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular imaging of bone metastasis.Journal of bone oncology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. [Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Imaging of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lanell M PetersonDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington lanell@uw.edu.
Janet O'SullivanDepartment of Statistics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Qian Vicky WuClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Alena Novakova-JiresovaDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Isaac JenkinsClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Jean H LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Andrew ShieldsDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Susan MontgomerySwedish Cancer Institute, Edmonds, Washington; and.
Hannah M LindenDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Julie GralowDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Vijayakrishna K GadiDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Mark MuziDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Paul KinahanDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
David MankoffDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jennifer M SpechtDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Core Laboratory for Advanced PET and MRI image analysisR50CA211270 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mark Muzi · 2017 to 2026
$2.6M
PET to Measure Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis ResponseR01CA124573 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SPECHT, JENNIFER MARIE · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124573NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing therapy response of breast cancer bone metastases is challenging. In retrospective studies, serial

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleFluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDG PET18F-NaF PETbone dominant breast cancerresponse to therapy

Identifiers

PMID29748233
PMCPMC6278903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.