Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29747659›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data.

Nicole Blay, Sharelle Ioannou, Marika Seremetkoska, Jenny Morris, Gael Holters, Verily Thomas, Everett Bronwyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nurse leadership: Sustaining a culture of safety.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Definitions ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicole BlayCentre for Applied Nursing Research (CANR), Ingham Institute, SWSLHD, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool BC, NSW, 1871, Australia. Nicole.Blay@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8515-4209
Sharelle IoannouBankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW, 2200, Australia.
Marika SeremetkoskaBankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW, 2200, Australia.
Jenny MorrisBankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW, 2200, Australia.
Gael HoltersBankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW, 2200, Australia.
Verily ThomasBankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW, 2200, Australia.
Everett BronwynCentre for Applied Nursing Research (CANR), Ingham Institute, SWSLHD, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool BC, NSW, 1871, Australia.

Funding

NSW Health Nursing and Midwifery Office Strategy Reserve N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew people with limited English proficiency are provided with the services of a healthcare interpreter when admitted to hospital. This retrospective study utilised health administrative data to explore which patients with limited English proficiency were provided with a healthcare interpreter during their hospital admission.

methodA retrospective analysis of health administrative data for adult overnight-stay patients admitted to a public hospital in a region of significant cultural and linguistic diversity in Sydney, Australia in 2014-2015. Descriptive analyses were used to explore demographic and diagnostic data. Chi-square and analysis of variance were used to test for association between variables.

resultsThe site hospital provided for 19,627 overnight-stay episodes of care over the one year period. Emergency admissions made up 70.5% (n = 13,845) of all hospital admissions and obstetric patients 11.7% (n = 2291). For 15.7% (n = 3074) of episodes of care a healthcare interpreter was identified at hospital admission as being required. In 3.7% (n = 727) of episodes of care a healthcare interpreter was provided. Patients who received an interpreter were more likely to be female, of a younger age and admitted to hospital for childbirth.

conclusionsA minority of patients with limited English proficiency received a healthcare interpreter during their episode of care. The majority of interpreter services were provided to obstetric patients.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelCommunicationLanguageTranslatingCommunication BarriersFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PublicHumansLinguisticsMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesPatient AdmissionProfessional-Patient RelationsRetrospective StudiesAdministrative dataCALDHealthcareInterpreter, limited English proficiencyLanguageObstetrics

Identifiers

PMID29747659
PMCPMC5946440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.