ArticleBMC health services research2018
Policies and clinical practices relating to the management of gestational diabetes mellitus in the public health sector, South Africa - a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postnatal care after gestational diabetes - a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- Barriers to screening, diagnosis and management of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in Africa: a systematic review.International health · 2022Pooled it
- "We have theoretical knowledge, but these are not things we do regularly": District hospital's healthcare workers' experiences and perceptions on gestational diabetes mellitus screening in Tanzania.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Self-management interventions for gestational diabetes in Africa: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Article
- Using the COM-B model and Behaviour Change Wheel to develop a theory and evidence-based intervention for women with gestational diabetes (IINDIAGO).BMC public health · 2023Article
- Exploring the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Healthy Pregnant Women Towards Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Nigeria.Qualitative health research · 2023Article
- Hyperglycemia First Detected in Pregnancy in South Africa: Facts, Gaps, and Opportunities.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022Review
- Article
- Perspectives on the psychological and emotional burden of having gestational diabetes amongst low-income women in Cape Town, South Africa.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- Public health system challenges in the Free State, South Africa: a situation appraisal to inform health system strengthening.BMC health services research · 2020Review
- Diabetes care in remote Australia: the antenatal, postpartum and inter-pregnancy period.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Article
- Integrating Gestational Diabetes Screening and Care and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prevention After GDM Into Community Based Primary Health Care in South Africa-Mixed Method Study.International journal of integrated careArticle
- Diagnosis of gestational diabetes in Uganda: The reactions of women, family members and health workers.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen with a prior gestational diabetes have an increased lifetime risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Although post-partum follow-up for GDM women is essential to prevent progression to type 2 diabetes, it is poorly attended. The need for health systems interventions to support postpartum follow-up for GDM women is evident, but there is little knowledge of actual current practice. The aim of this study was to explore current policies and clinical practices relating to antenatal and post-natal care for women with GDM in South Africa, as well as health sector stakeholders' perspectives on the barriers to -- and opportunities for -- delivering an integrated mother - baby health service that extends beyond the first week post-partum, to the infant's first year of life.
methodsFollowing a document review of policy and clinical practice guidelines, in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 key informants who were key policy makers, health service managers and clinicians working in the public health services in South Africa's two major cities (Johannesburg and Cape Town). Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis procedures.
resultsThe document review and interviews established that it is policy that health services adhere to international guidelines for GDM diagnosis and management, in addition to locally developed guidelines and protocols for clinical practice. All key informants confirmed that lack of postpartum follow-up for GDM women is a significant problem. Health systems barriers include fragmentation of care and the absence of standardised postnatal care for post-GDM women. Key informants also raised patient - related challenges including lack of perceived future risk of developing type 2 diabetes and non-attendance for postpartum follow up, as barriers to postnatal care for GDM women. All participants supported integrated primary health services but cautioned against overloading health workers.
conclusionAlthough there is alignment between international guidelines, local policy and reported clinical practice in the management of GDM, there is a gap in continuation of care in the postpartum period. Health systems interventions that support and facilitate active follow-up for women with prior GDM are needed if high rates of progression to type 2 diabetes are to be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.