Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29747651›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2018

The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence.

Susan Baxter, Maxine Johnson, Duncan Chambers, Anthea Sutton, Elizabeth Goyder, Andrew Booth

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04474678 (A Quality Improvement Project to Implement Psychosocial Care Standards in Clinical Practice in Pediatric Oncology "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!"), which is not on this map. Cited by 321 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
321citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
91.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04474678 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Quality Improvement Project to Implement Psychosocial Care Standards in Clinical Practice in Pediatric Oncology "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!" ("Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!") Development and Evaluation of a Consensus and Evidence Based Psychosocial Therapy Tool in a Preliminary Psychosocial Study on Therapy Optimization.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled240ConditionsBrain Tumor, Neurofibromatoses, Sarcoma, LeukemiaArms"My Logbook! - I know my way around!"
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

321 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 677 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Person-centred integrated care for people living with Parkinson's, Huntington's and Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  9. Value-Based Integrated Care: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2024
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Challenges to Systems of Long-Term Care: Mapping of the Central Concepts from an Umbrella Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

261 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan BaxterSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S14DA, UK. s.k.baxter@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6034-5495
Maxine JohnsonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S14DA, UK.
Duncan ChambersSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S14DA, UK.
Anthea SuttonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S14DA, UK.
Elizabeth GoyderSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S14DA, UK.
Andrew BoothSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S14DA, UK.
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/15/77/10Health Services and Delivery Research Programme HS&DR 15/77/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare systems around the world have been responding to the demand for better integrated models of service delivery. However, there is a need for further clarity regarding the effects of these new models of integration, and exploration regarding whether models introduced in other care systems may achieve similar outcomes in a UK national health service context.

methodsThe study aimed to carry out a systematic review of the effects of integration or co-ordination between healthcare services, or between health and social care on service delivery outcomes including effectiveness, efficiency and quality of care. Electronic databases including MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Science and Social Science Citation Indices; and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant literature published between 2006 to March 2017. Online sources were searched for UK grey literature, and citation searching, and manual reference list screening were also carried out. Quantitative primary studies and systematic reviews, reporting actual or perceived effects on service delivery following the introduction of models of integration or co-ordination, in healthcare or health and social care settings in developed countries were eligible for inclusion. Strength of evidence for each outcome reported was analysed and synthesised using a four point comparative rating system of stronger, weaker, inconsistent or limited evidence.

resultsOne hundred sixty seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Analysis indicated evidence of perceived improved quality of care, evidence of increased patient satisfaction, and evidence of improved access to care. Evidence was rated as either inconsistent or limited regarding all other outcomes reported, including system-wide impacts on primary care, secondary care, and health care costs. There were limited differences between outcomes reported by UK and international studies, and overall the literature had a limited consideration of effects on service users.

conclusionsModels of integrated care may enhance patient satisfaction, increase perceived quality of care, and enable access to services, although the evidence for other outcomes including service costs remains unclear. Indications of improved access may have important implications for services struggling to cope with increasing demand.

trial registrationProspero registration number: 42016037725 .

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedDeveloped CountriesGlobal HealthHealth Care CostsHumansNational Health ProgramsPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementSecondary Health CareSocial WelfareIntegrated careService reconfiguration, service deliverySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29747651
PMCPMC5946491
OpenAlexW2800737974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.