Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29747597›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Physical activity for antenatal and postnatal depression in women attempting to quit smoking: randomised controlled trial.

Amanda Daley, Muhammad Riaz, Sarah Lewis, Paul Aveyard, Tim Coleman, Isaac Manyonda, Robert West, Beth Lewis, Bess Marcus, Adrian Taylor and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Exercise interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda DaleySport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. a.daley@lboro.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-8726
Muhammad RiazPopulation Health Research Institute, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Sarah LewisDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Paul AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Tim ColemanDivision of Primary Care and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Isaac ManyondaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St George's University of London and St George's NHS Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Robert WestHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Beth LewisSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Bess MarcusDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, 92093-0628, USA.
Adrian TaylorPlymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BX, UK.
Judith IbisonInstitute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
Andrew KentInstitute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
Michael UssherPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
St George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBLoughborough University · GBPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1NIHR HTA 07.01.14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal depression is associated with harmful consequences for both the mother and child. One intervention that might be effective is participation in regular physical activity although data on this question in pregnant smokers is currently lacking.

methodsWomen were randomised to six-weekly sessions of smoking cessation behavioural-support, or to the same support plus 14 sessions combining treadmill exercise and physical activity consultations.

resultsAmong 784 participants (mean gestation 16-weeks), EPDS was significantly higher in the physical activity group versus usual care at end-of-pregnancy (mean group difference (95% confidence intervals (CIs)): 0.95 (0.08 to 1.83). There was no significant difference at six-months postpartum.

conclusionA pragmatic intervention to increase physical activity in pregnant smokers did not prevent depression at end-of-pregnancy or at six-months postpartum. More effective physical activity interventions are needed in this population.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN48600346 . The trial was prospectively registered on 21/07/2008.

Indexed as

AdultDepressionExerciseFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareSmoking CessationTreatment OutcomeAntenatalDepressionPhysical activityPostnatalPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29747597
PMCPMC5946409
OpenAlexW2804693018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.