ArticleBMC neurology2018
Differentiation of neuropsychological features between posterior cortical atrophy and early onset Alzheimer's disease.
Article in BMC neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03653156 (China Cognition and Aging Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
China Cognition and Aging Study: a Multi-center, National-wide, Longitudinal Study in China
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visuospatial working memory dysfunction from tapping span test as a diagnostic tool for patients with mild posterior cortical atrophy.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- The Heterogeneity of Reading and Spelling Deficits in Posterior Cortical Atrophy.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Language disorders in understudied languages: Opening editorial.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025Article
- Speech and language markers of neurodegeneration: a call for global equity.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Review
- The Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test as a Predictor of Neurocognitive Disorder in Older Veterans.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023Article
- Atypical Alzheimer's disease phenotypes with normal or borderline PET biomarker profiles.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Primary and Secondary Progressive Aphasia in Posterior Cortical Atrophy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Temporal Cortical Thickness and Cognitive Associations among Typical and Atypical Phenotypes of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2022Article
- Posterior Cortical Atrophy: Characteristics From a Clinical Data Registry.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Cross-cultural Differences in Dementia: Indian Etiquette of Honorifics.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
- Unveiling unified patterns in Alzheimer's disease subtypes: An SCCA clustering approach integrating PET imaging and genomics data.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPosterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is a group of clinical syndromes characterized by visuospatial and visuoperceptual impairment, with memory relatively preserved. Although PCA is pathologically almost identical to Alzheimer's disease (AD), they have different cognitive features. Those differences have only rarely been reported in any Chinese population. The purpose of the study is to establish neuropsychological tests that distinguish the clinical features of PCA from early onset AD (EOAD).
methodsTwenty-one PCA patients, 20 EOAD patients, and 20 healthy controls participated in this study. Patients had disease duration of ≤4 years. All participants completed a series of neuropsychological tests to evaluate their visuospatial, visuoperceptual, visuo-constructive, language, executive function, memory, calculation, writing, and reading abilities. The cognitive features of PCA and EOAD were compared.
resultsAll the neuropsychological test scores showed that both the PCA and EOAD patients were significantly more impaired than people in the control group. However, PCA patients were significantly more impaired than EOAD patients in visuospatial, visuoperceptual, and visuo-constructive function, as well as in handwriting, and reading Chinese characters.
conclusionsThe profile of neuropsychological test results highlights cognitive features that differ between PCA and EOAD. One surprising result is that the two syndromes could be distinguished by patients' ability to read and write Chinese characters. Tests based on these characteristics could therefore form a brief PCA neuropsychological examination that would improve the diagnosis of PCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.