Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29747447›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases-Related Dietary Nutrient Profile in the UK (2008⁻2014).

Fernanda Rauber, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada, Eurídice Martínez Steele, Christopher Millett, Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Renata Bertazzi Levy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 270 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
270citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
56.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

270 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 619 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

210 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Fernanda RauberCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil. rauber.fernanda@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9693-7954
Maria Laura da Costa LouzadaCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil. maria.laura.louzada@gmail.com.
Eurídice Martínez SteeleCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil. emar_steele@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-3153
Christopher MillettCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil. c.millett@imperial.ac.uk.
Carlos Augusto MonteiroCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil. carlosam@usp.br.
Renata Bertazzi LevyCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil. rlevy@usp.br.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-7002
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Department of Health RP_2014-04-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We described the contribution of ultra-processed foods in the U.K. diet and its association with the overall dietary content of nutrients known to affect the risk of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Cross-sectional data from the U.K. National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008⁻2014) were analysed. Food items collected using a four-day food diary were classified according to the NOVA system. The average energy intake was 1764 kcal/day, with 30.1% of calories coming from unprocessed or minimally processed foods, 4.2% from culinary ingredients, 8.8% from processed foods, and 56.8% from ultra-processed foods. As the ultra-processed food consumption increased, the dietary content of carbohydrates, free sugars, total fats, saturated fats, and sodium increased significantly while the content of protein, fibre, and potassium decreased. Increased ultra-processed food consumption had a remarkable effect on average content of free sugars, which increased from 9.9% to 15.4% of total energy from the first to the last quintile. The prevalence of people exceeding the upper limits recommended for free sugars and sodium increased by 85% and 55%, respectively, from the lowest to the highest ultra-processed food quintile. Decreasing the dietary share of ultra-processed foods may substantially improve the nutritional quality of diets and contribute to the prevention of diet-related NCDs.

Indexed as

DietFast FoodsCross-Sectional StudiesDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary FiberDietary ProteinsFamily CharacteristicsFood HandlingHumansMicronutrientsNoncommunicable DiseasesNutrition AssessmentNutrition SurveysNutritive ValuePrevalenceDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary FiberDietary ProteinsMicronutrientsdiet qualityfood processingultra-processedUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID29747447
PMCPMC5986467
OpenAlexW2799455061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.