ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018
Safety Evaluations of
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical Safety and Toxicological Assessment of Vitamin BMolecular nutrition & food research · 2026Article
- Genome-Informed Characterization of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ND88 with Inhibitory Activity against Representative Oral Pathogens.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Safety and Next-Generation Probiotic Potential of Mitsuokella multacida AGMB01124 Newly Isolated from Healthy Swine Feces.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Prospects and challenges in using engineered lactic acid bacteria in aquaculture applications.Engineering microbiology · 2026Review
- Alleviation of Ulcerative Colitis in Mice by Individual Fermentation ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Subacute 28-Day OECD-Guided Oral Toxicity Study ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Clinical Safety and Tolerability ofFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Immuno-oncological Challenges and Chemoresistance in Veterinary Medicine: Probiotics as a New Strategic Tool.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Exploring the Potential Probiotic Properties of Bifidobacterium breve DSM 32583-A Novel Strain Isolated from Human Milk.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Bifidobacteria and Celiac Disease: Mechanisms of Probiotic Action in Reducing Gluten-Induced Cytotoxicity and Inflammation.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the techno-functional properties of lactobacilli strains originated from Bos indicus and Bubalus bubalis calves for probiotic potential.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Safety Assessment ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Highlighting Lactic Acid Bacteria in Beverages: Diversity, Fermentation, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Genomic and Phenotypic Insight into the Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacterial spp. Associated with the Human Gut Mucosa.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Hypoglycemic, Antioxidant Activities, and Probiotic Characteristics ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive genomic analysis and evaluation of in vivo and in vitro safety of Heyndrickxia coagulans BC99.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Combating antibiotic resistance in a one health context: a plethora of frontiers.One health outlook · 2024Review
- Genome-based taxonomic identification and safety assessment of an Enterococcus strain isolated from a homemade dairy product.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, a variety of lactic acid bacteria have been commercially available to and steadily used by consumers. However, recent studies have shown that some lactic acid bacteria produce toxic substances and display properties of virulence. To establish safety guidelines for lactic acid bacteria, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) has suggested that lactic acid bacteria be characterized and proven safe for consumers’ health via multiple experiments (e.g., antibiotic resistance, metabolic activity, toxin production, hemolytic activity, infectivity in immune-compromised animal species, human side effects, and adverse-outcome analyses). Among the lactic acid bacteria,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.