ReviewNeuro-oncology2018
Blood-based biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of gliomas.
Review in Neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- The metabolic addiction of cancer stem cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Blood Biomarkers of Glioma in Response Assessment Including Pseudoprogression and Other Treatment Effects: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Pyrosequencing versus methylation-specific PCR for assessment of MGMT methylation in tumor and blood samples of glioblastoma patients.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Platelet-to-Albumin Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in IDH-Wildtype Grade 4 Diffuse Glioma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Preanalytical variables and analytes in liquid biopsy approach for brain tumors: A comprehensive review and recommendations from the RANO Group and the Brain Liquid Biopsy Consortium.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Signal Amplification for Fluorescent Staining of Single Particles in Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Tumour Cells and Extracellular Vesicles.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
- Innovative perspectives on glioblastoma: the emerging role of long non-coding RNAs.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Advances in Glioblastoma Diagnosis: Integrating Genetics, Noninvasive Sampling, and Advanced Imaging.Cancers · 2025Review
- Clinical research framework proposal for ketogenic metabolic therapy in glioblastoma.BMC medicine · 2024Review
- Current status of precision oncology in adult glioblastoma.Molecular oncology · 2024Review
- Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogen: Role in Biopsy for Precision Medicine.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Potential of sonobiopsy as a novel diagnosis tool for brain cancer.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2024Review
- Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of ACSS3 as a biomarker for prognosis and immunotherapy response.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Review
- MoSACS nano · 2023Article
- High Expression ofGenes · 2023Article
- Assessment and prediction of glioblastoma therapy response: challenges and opportunities.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Engineered EVs designed to target diseases of the CNS.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023Review
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring patient response to treatment is challenging for most cancers, but it is particularly difficult in glioblastoma multiform, the most common and aggressive form of malignant brain tumor. These tumors exhibit a high degree of heterogeneity which may not be reflected in a biopsy. To determine if the current standard of care is effective, glioma patients are monitored using MRI or CT scans, an effective but sometimes misleading approach due to the phenomenon of pseudoprogression. As such, there is incredible need for a minimally invasive "liquid biopsy" to assist in molecularly characterizing the tumors while also aiding in the identification of true progression in glioblastoma. This review details the status and potential impact for circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles, ctDNA, and ctRNA, putative circulating biomarkers found in the blood in glioblastoma patients. As mutation-based therapy becomes more prevalent in gliomas, blood-based analyses may offer a non-invasive method of identifying mutations. The ability to obtain serial "liquid biopsies" will provide unique opportunities to study the evolution of tumors and mechanisms of treatment resistance and monitor for mutational changes in response to therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.