Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29746572›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach.

Valeriy Kuznyetsov, Svetlana Madjunkova, Ran Antes, Rina Abramov, Gelareh Motamedi, Zenon Ibarrientos, Clifford Librach

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04711239 (Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04711239 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (niPGT-A) - Evaluation of the Analysis of Cell-free DNA in Spent Culture Medium

TypeobservationalSponsorART Fertility Clinics LLCRan2021 to 2021Enrolled0ConditionsSecondary InfertilityArmsPGT-A / niPGT-A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Genomic aspects in reproductive medicine.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valeriy KuznyetsovCReATe Fertility Center, Toronto, Canada.
Svetlana MadjunkovaCReATe Fertility Center, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8233-6621
Ran AntesCReATe Fertility Center, Toronto, Canada.
Rina AbramovCReATe Fertility Center, Toronto, Canada.
Gelareh MotamediCReATe Fertility Center, Toronto, Canada.
Zenon IbarrientosCReATe Fertility Center, Toronto, Canada.
Clifford LibrachCReATe Fertility Center, Toronto, Canada.
CReATe Fertility Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether embryonic DNA isolated from blastocyst culture conditioned medium (BCCM) combined with blastocoel fluid (BF) could be used for blastocyst stage non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening, NIPGS). PATIENTS: 47 embryos from 35 patients undergoing IVF.

interventionsDNA analysis of combined BCCM plus BF in comparison with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and/or whole blastocyst (WB)using next generation sequencing (NGS).

resultsEmbryonic DNA was successfully amplified in 47/47 NIPGS samples (28 frozen-thawed and 19 fresh culture samples) ranging from 6.3 to 44.0 ng/μl. For frozen-thawed embryos, the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample was equivalent between NIPGS vs. TE biopsy, NIPGS vs. WB and TE vs. WB samples taken from the same embryo was 87.5%; 96.4% and 91.7% respectively (P>0.05), and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 99.3%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively (P>0.05). In fresh cases (Day 4 to Day 5/6 culture), the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample between NIPGS vs. TE samples taken from the same embryo was 100%, and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 98.2% (P>0.05).

conclusionsA combination of BCCM and BF contains sufficient embryonic DNA for whole genome amplification and accurate aneuploidy screening. Our findings suggest that aneuploidy screening using BCCM combined with BF could potentially serve as a novel NIPGS approach for use in human IVF.

Indexed as

BlastocystCulture Media, ConditionedGenetic TestingPreimplantation DiagnosisAneuploidyDNAEmbryo Culture TechniquesFertilization in VitroHumansProof of Concept StudySequence Analysis, DNACulture Media, ConditionedDNA

Identifiers

PMID29746572
PMCPMC5944986
OpenAlexW2801510830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.