Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29746507›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Feasibility of using postal and web-based surveys to estimate the prevalence of tuberculosis among health care workers in South Africa.

Pinky N Manana, Lazarus Kuonza, Alfred Musekiwa, Hendrik Koornhof, Ananta Nanoo, Nazir Ismail

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. South African speech-language therapists' opinion of their training in cleft lip and palate and craniofacial deformities.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pinky N MananaSouth African Field Epidemiology Training Programme, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6502-4308
Lazarus KuonzaSouth African Field Epidemiology Training Programme, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Alfred MusekiwaSouth African Field Epidemiology Training Programme, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Hendrik KoornhofCentre for Tuberculosis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ananta NanooCentre for Tuberculosis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nazir IsmailCentre for Tuberculosis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
National Health Laboratory Service · ZANational Institute for Communicable Diseases

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth Care Workers (HCWs) are among the highest risk groups for contracting tuberculosis (TB), which is ranked the third most common occupational health disease in South Africa. Little is known about the true extent of the burden of TB among South African HCWs and current surveillance approaches are inadequate. The study aimed to determine the feasibility of using postal and web-based surveys accessed through registries of registered professionals to estimate the prevalence of TB among HCWs in South Africa. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a cross sectional survey on a sample of professional nurses and doctors (general practitioners) registered on the Medpages database platform; a subscription based registry for practising health care professionals. The survey included professionals who were actively involved in the clinical management of patients, either in public or private health care facilities. The paper based survey, including pre-paid return envelopes, was distributed via the post office and web-based surveys were distributed via e-mail through a hyperlink. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and the Chi-square test to determine associations between categorical variables. Active TB was defined as any history of TB.

resultsOut of a total of 3,400 health care professionals contacted, 596 (18%) responses were received: 401 (67%) web-based and 195 (33%) postal. A significantly higher percentage of complete forms were from postal compared to web-based (97% [189/195] versus 87% [348/401], p<0.001). Younger (<60 years) professionals were more likely to use the web-based compared to postal (87% [236/270] versus 71% [134/189], p<0.001). Overall, the prevalence of active TB infection was 8.7%, (95%CI: 6.3%-11.7%) and there was no difference observed between doctors and nurses (10.8% [18/167] versus 7.5% [22/292], p = 0.236).

conclusionThis novel approach demonstrated the feasibility of using an existing registry of professionals to conduct surveys to estimate the prevalence of TB. Our findings showed a high TB prevalence; however the estimate might have been biased by the low response rate. Further research to optimise our approach could lead to a viable option in improving surveillance among health care professionals.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelDatabases, FactualOccupational ExposureSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSouth AfricaTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID29746507
PMCPMC5945004
OpenAlexW2801606182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.