Trial reportPloS one2018
Clinical evaluation of semi-automatic open-source algorithmic software segmentation of the mandibular bone: Practical feasibility and assessment of a new course of action.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A step-by-step guide for implementation of virtual surgical applications and patient data centralization: practical experience and lessons learned.3D printing in medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of 3D reconstruction of paranasal sinuses for simulated personal identification using Dolphin imaging and mimics software.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Mandible segmentation from CT data for virtual surgical planning using an augmented two-stepped convolutional neural network.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- 3D Multi-Modality Medical Imaging: Combining Anatomical and Infrared Thermal Images for 3D Reconstruction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advantages of a Training Course for Surgical Planning in Virtual Reality for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Crossover Study.JMIR serious games · 2023Article
- Mandibular reconstructions with free fibula flap using standardized partially adjustable cutting guides or CAD/CAM technique: a three- and two-dimensional comparison.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Realizing in-house algorithm-driven free fibula flap set up within 24 hours: a pilot study evaluating accuracy with open-source tools.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Dual-Stage Deeply Supervised Attention-Based Convolutional Neural Networks for Mandibular Canal Segmentation in CBCT Scans.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Establishing a Point-of-Care Virtual Planning and 3D Printing Program.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2022Review
- Comparison of Three 3D Segmentation Software Tools for Hip Surgical Planning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Automatic mandible segmentation from CT image using 3D fully convolutional neural network based on DenseASPP and attention gates.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- Automatic Segmentation of Mandible from Conventional Methods to Deep Learning-A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Tracking-based deep learning method for temporomandibular joint segmentation.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- In-House, Open-Source 3D-Software-Based, CAD/CAM-Planned Mandibular Reconstructions in 20 Consecutive Free Fibula Flap Cases: An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study With Three-Dimensional Performance Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Introducing Biomedisa as an open-source online platform for biomedical image segmentation.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
- Marker-based watershed transform method for fully automatic mandibular segmentation from CBCT images.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2019Article
- Computed tomography data collection of the complete human mandible and valid clinical ground truth models.Scientific data · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionComputer assisted technologies based on algorithmic software segmentation are an increasing topic of interest in complex surgical cases. However-due to functional instability, time consuming software processes, personnel resources or licensed-based financial costs many segmentation processes are often outsourced from clinical centers to third parties and the industry. Therefore, the aim of this trial was to assess the practical feasibility of an easy available, functional stable and licensed-free segmentation approach to be used in the clinical practice. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this retrospective, randomized, controlled trail the accuracy and accordance of the open-source based segmentation algorithm GrowCut was assessed through the comparison to the manually generated ground truth of the same anatomy using 10 CT lower jaw data-sets from the clinical routine. Assessment parameters were the segmentation time, the volume, the voxel number, the Dice Score and the Hausdorff distance.
resultsOverall semi-automatic GrowCut segmentation times were about one minute. Mean Dice Score values of over 85% and Hausdorff Distances below 33.5 voxel could be achieved between the algorithmic GrowCut-based segmentations and the manual generated ground truth schemes. Statistical differences between the assessment parameters were not significant (p<0.05) and correlation coefficients were close to the value one (r > 0.94) for any of the comparison made between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Complete functional stable and time saving segmentations with high accuracy and high positive correlation could be performed by the presented interactive open-source based approach. In the cranio-maxillofacial complex the used method could represent an algorithmic alternative for image-based segmentation in the clinical practice for e.g. surgical treatment planning or visualization of postoperative results and offers several advantages. Due to an open-source basis the used method could be further developed by other groups or specialists. Systematic comparisons to other segmentation approaches or with a greater data amount are areas of future works.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.