Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29746337›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2019

Bowel Obstruction and Ventral Hernia After Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer in A Randomized Trial (COLOR II).

Josefin Petersson, Thomas W Koedam, H Jaap Bonjer, John Andersson, Eva Angenete, David Bock, Miguel A Cuesta, Charlotte L Deijen, Alois Fürst, Antonio M Lacy and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Multimodal Treatment of Rectal Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Josefin PeterssonDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University, Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Thomas W KoedamDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H Jaap BonjerDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John AnderssonDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University, Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eva AngeneteDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University, Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
David BockDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University, Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Miguel A CuestaDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte L DeijenDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alois FürstDepartment of Surgery, Caritas Krankenhaus St Josef Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Antonio M LacyDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Clínic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.
Jacob RosenbergDepartment of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Eva HaglindDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University, Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) II Study Group
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLSahlgrenska University Hospital · SECaritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef · DEHospital Universitari de Vic · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of bowel obstruction, incisional, and parastomal hernia following laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been adopted worldwide, after trials reported similar oncological outcomes compared with open surgery. Little is known about long-term morbidity, including bowel obstruction, incisional, and parastomal hernia following surgery.

methodsPatients included in the international, multicenter, noninferior, open-label, randomized COLOR II trial were followed for five years. Primary endpoint was local recurrence at 3-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints included bowel obstruction, incisional and parastomal hernia within 5 years, and the current article reports on these secondary endpoints.

resultsAll 1044 patients included in the COLOR II trial were analyzed. There was no difference in risk of bowel obstruction, incisional, or parastomal hernia following laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal cancer.

conclusionBased on long-term morbidity outcomes, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer could be considered a routine technique as there are no differences with open surgery.

Indexed as

Intestine, SmallPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeFemaleHernia, VentralHumansIncidenceIntestinal ObstructionLaparoscopyLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29746337
OpenAlexW2802115305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.