ArticleMedical physics2018
DNA double-strand breaks as a method of radiation measurements for therapeutic beams.
Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Dual-Pronged Hafnia-Prodrug-Lipid Nanoplatform Coupling Radiosensitization and DNA Homologous Recombination Inhibition.ACS nano medicine · 2026Article
- Single-Molecule Biodosimetry.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Rapid quantitative analysis of double-stranded plasmid DNA with capillary gel electrophoresis for applications in quality control and radiation research.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Radiation and DNA Origami Nanotechnology: Probing Structural Integrity at the Nanoscale.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025Review
- Clustered DNA Damage Patterns after Proton Therapy Beam Irradiation Using Plasmid DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A mechanistic mathematical model of initiation and malignant transformation in sporadic vestibular schwannoma.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- DNA Stability in Biodosimetry, Pharmacy and DNA Based Data-Storage: Optimal Storage and Handling Conditions.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2022Article
- Assessing the DNA Damaging Effectiveness of Ionizing Radiation Using Plasmid DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- DNA dosimeter measurements of beam profile using a novel simultaneous processing technique.Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine · 2020Article
- DNA Dosimeter Measurement of Relative Biological Effectiveness for 160 kVp and 6 MV X Rays.Radiation research · 2020Article
- Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: Quantifying the Radiobiological Damage Using Monte Carlo Simulations.Cancers · 2020Review
- Optimizing the response, precision, and cost of a DNA double-strand break dosimeter.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Quantification of DNA double-strand breaks using Geant4-DNA.Medical physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMany types of dosimeters are used to measure radiation dose and calibrate radiotherapy equipment, but none directly measure the biological effect of this dose. The purpose here is to create a dosimeter that can measure the probability of double-strand breaks (DSB) for DNA, which is directly related to the biological effect of radiation.
methodsA DNA dosimeter, consisting of magnetic streptavidin beads attached to four kilobase pair DNA strands labeled with biotin and fluorescein amidite (FAM) on opposing ends, was suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Fifty microliter samples were placed in plastic tubes inside a water tank setup and irradiated at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy. After irradiation, the dosimeters were mechanically separated into beads (intact DNA) and supernatant (broken DNA/FAM) using a magnet. The fluorescence was read and the probability of DSB was calculated. This DNA dosimeter response was benchmarked against a Southern blot analysis technique for the measurement of DSB probability.
resultsFor the DNA dosimeter, the probabilities of DSB at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy were 0.043, 0.081, 0.149, 0.196, and 0.242, respectively, and the standard errors of the mean were 0.002, 0.003, 0.006, 0.005, and 0.011, respectively. For the Southern blot method, the probabilities of DSB at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy were 0.053, 0.105, 0.198, 0.235, and 0.264, respectively, and the standard errors of the mean were 0.013, 0.024, 0.040, 0.044, and 0.063, respectively.
conclusionsA DNA dosimeter can accurately determine the probability of DNA double-strand break (DSB), one of the most toxic effects of radiotherapy, for absorbed radiation doses from 25 to 200 Gy. This is an important step in demonstrating the viability of DNA dosimeters as a measurement technique for radiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.