Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29745994›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2018

DNA double-strand breaks as a method of radiation measurements for therapeutic beams.

Mohammad Obeidat, Kristen A McConnell, Xiaolei Li, Brian Bui, Sotirios Stathakis, Niko Papanikolaou, Karl Rasmussen, Chul Soo Ha, Sang Eun Lee, Eun Yong Shim and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Single-Molecule Biodosimetry.Analytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Radiation and DNA Origami Nanotechnology: Probing Structural Integrity at the Nanoscale.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  10. DNA dosimeter measurements of beam profile using a novel simultaneous processing technique.Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad ObeidatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Kristen A McConnellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Xiaolei LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Brian BuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Sotirios StathakisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Niko PapanikolaouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Karl RasmussenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Chul Soo HaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Sang Eun LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Eun Yong ShimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Neil KirbyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

San Antonio Biomedical Education and ResearchK12GM111726 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LECHLEITER, JAMES D, OYAJOBI, BABATUNDE OLUKAYODE · 2015 to 2024
$7.6M
Mechanisms of Error Prone Repair of DNA BreaksR01GM071011 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LEE, SANG EUN · 2004 to 2021
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM111726NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany types of dosimeters are used to measure radiation dose and calibrate radiotherapy equipment, but none directly measure the biological effect of this dose. The purpose here is to create a dosimeter that can measure the probability of double-strand breaks (DSB) for DNA, which is directly related to the biological effect of radiation.

methodsA DNA dosimeter, consisting of magnetic streptavidin beads attached to four kilobase pair DNA strands labeled with biotin and fluorescein amidite (FAM) on opposing ends, was suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Fifty microliter samples were placed in plastic tubes inside a water tank setup and irradiated at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy. After irradiation, the dosimeters were mechanically separated into beads (intact DNA) and supernatant (broken DNA/FAM) using a magnet. The fluorescence was read and the probability of DSB was calculated. This DNA dosimeter response was benchmarked against a Southern blot analysis technique for the measurement of DSB probability.

resultsFor the DNA dosimeter, the probabilities of DSB at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy were 0.043, 0.081, 0.149, 0.196, and 0.242, respectively, and the standard errors of the mean were 0.002, 0.003, 0.006, 0.005, and 0.011, respectively. For the Southern blot method, the probabilities of DSB at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy were 0.053, 0.105, 0.198, 0.235, and 0.264, respectively, and the standard errors of the mean were 0.013, 0.024, 0.040, 0.044, and 0.063, respectively.

conclusionsA DNA dosimeter can accurately determine the probability of DNA double-strand break (DSB), one of the most toxic effects of radiotherapy, for absorbed radiation doses from 25 to 200 Gy. This is an important step in demonstrating the viability of DNA dosimeters as a measurement technique for radiation.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy DosageAnimalsBiotinBlotting, SouthernDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedEquipment DesignHumansProbabilityRadiation DosimetersRadiometrySodium ChlorideStreptavidinWaterBiotinSodium ChlorideStreptavidinWaterDNA dosimeterradiation dosimetryradiation therapy measurementsSouthern blot analysis

Identifiers

PMID29745994
PMCPMC6477916
OpenAlexW2800228933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.