ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2018
[Effect of cryoprotectant removal by microfluidic chip on developmental capacity of oocytes].
Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [High throughput detection and characterization of red blood cells deformability by combining optical tweezers with microfluidic technique].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to reduce osmotic damage and chemical toxicity of cryoprotectants (CPA) to oocytes during unloading process, the microfluidic chip was used to remove CPA from porcine MⅡ oocytes in this study. Firstly, the effects of unloading time, composition and concentration of diluting solutions of microfluidic method on survival rate and developmental capacity of oocytes were studied, then microfluidic method was compared with traditional one-step and two-step CPA unloading protocols. The results showed that when the total time is 8 minutes, the survival rate and morula rate of oocytes treated with microfluidic method could achieve 95.99% ± 4.64% and 74.17% ± 1.18%, respectively, which were not significantly different from fresh control group (98.53% ± 2.94%; 78.22% ± 1.34%). In addition, 1 mol/L sucrose diluting solutions were more beneficial than other solutions, and it was also showed that microfluidic method achieved better survival, cleavage rate of oocytes than traditional methods. Microfluidic CPA removal protocol can reduce the damage to oocytes during unloading process, and may further improve the cryopreservation effect of oocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.