Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29745603›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2018

[Research on Kalman interpolation prediction model based on micro-region PM2.5 concentration].

Wei Wang, Bin Zheng, Binlin Chen, Yaoming An, Xiaoming Jiang, Zhangyong Li

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei WangResearch Center of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, P.R.China.
Bin ZhengResearch Center of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, P.R.China.
Binlin ChenResearch Center of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, P.R.China.
Yaoming AnResearch Center of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, P.R.China.
Xiaoming JiangResearch Center of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, P.R.China.
Zhangyong LiResearch Center of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, P.R.China.lizy@cqupt.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the pollution problem of particulate matter, especially PM2.5, is becoming more and more serious, which has attracted many people's attention from all over the world. In this paper, a Kalman prediction model combined with cubic spline interpolation is proposed, which is applied to predict the concentration of PM2.5 in the micro-regional environment of campus, and to realize interpolation simulation diagram of concentration of PM2.5 and simulate the spatial distribution of PM2.5. The experiment data are based on the environmental information monitoring system which has been set up by our laboratory. And the predicted and actual values of PM2.5 concentration data have been checked by the way of Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We find that the value of bilateral progressive significance probability was 0.527, which is much greater than the significant level

Indexed as

cubic spline interpolationKalman predictionmicro regionPM2.5 concentration

Identifiers

PMID29745603
PMCPMC10307556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.