ReviewSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2018
[Endothelial injury and its repair strategies after intravascular stents implantation].
Review in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Hybrid Strategy With Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Stent-Only Strategy for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Pooled it
- Association between stent length and number and the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pharmacological Effects and Development Prospects of the Main Active Compounds ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A clinical prediction model for post-procedural hemolysis after transcatheter VSD closure in children.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- [Review of studies on the biomechanical modelling of the coupling effect between stent degradation and blood vessel remodeling].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease is a serious threat to human life and health. In recent years, the main treatment for it is to implant the intravascular stent into the lesion to support blood vessels and reconstruct blood supply. However, a large number of experimental results showed that mechanical injury and anti-proliferative drugs caused great damage after stent implantation, and increased in-stent restenosis and late thrombosis risk. Thus, maintaining the integrity and normal function of the endothelium can significantly reduce the rate of thrombosis and restenosis. Stem cell mobilization, homing, differentiation and proliferation are the main mechanisms of endothelial repair after vascular stent implantation. Vascular factor and mechanical microenvironmental changes in implanted sites have a certain effect on re-endothelialization. In this paper, the process of injury caused by stent implantation, the repair mechanism after injury and its influencing factors are expounded in detail. And repairing strategies are analyzed and summarized. This review provides a reference for overcoming the in-stent restenosis, endothelialization delay and late thrombosis during the interventional treatment, as well as for designing drug-eluting and biodegradation stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.